kotlin-review

kotlin-review is a command for Claude Code from loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes. It costs 27 tokens per session (917 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Kotlin-specific code review command that examines changed files, builds, static checks, security risks, null handling, and coroutine usage. Coroutines are Kotlin's way to run asynchronous work without blocking threads.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Kotlin changes, prepare a pull request, check unfamiliar Kotlin code, or learn idiomatic patterns.
Why use it?
It helps find unsafe Kotlin patterns, security problems, and concurrency mistakes before code is committed or merged.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

Part of the awesome-claude-notes plugin — 106 skills, 61 commands, 28 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review Kotlin changes, prepare a pull request, check unfamiliar Kotlin code, or learn idiomatic patterns.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install awesome-claude-notes, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 106 skills, 61 commands, 28 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for kotlin-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for kotlin-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 917 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.00917
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00458
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00183
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00092

Measured 7d ago against content hash 0d245b80d107, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

kotlin-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

commands/kotlin-review.md · 148 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Kotlin Code Review

This command invokes the kotlin-reviewer agent for comprehensive Kotlin-specific code review.

What This Command Does

  1. Identify Kotlin Changes: Find modified .kt and .kts files via git diff
  2. Run Build & Static Analysis: Execute ./gradlew build, detekt, ktlintCheck
  3. Security Scan: Check for SQL injection, command injection, hardcoded secrets
  4. Null Safety Review: Analyze !! usage, platform type handling, unsafe casts
  5. Coroutine Review: Check structured concurrency, dispatcher usage, cancellation
  6. Generate Report: Categorize issues by severity

When to Use

Use /kotlin-review when:

  • After writing or modifying Kotlin code
  • Before committing Kotlin changes
  • Reviewing pull requests with Kotlin code
  • Onboarding to a new Kotlin codebase
  • Learning idiomatic Kotlin patterns

Review Categories

CRITICAL (Must Fix)

  • SQL/Command injection vulnerabilities
  • Force-unwrap !! without justification
  • Platform type null safety violations
  • GlobalScope usage (structured concurrency violation)
  • Hardcoded credentials
  • Unsafe deserialization

HIGH (Should Fix)

  • Mutable state where immutable suffices
  • Blocking calls inside coroutine context
  • Missing cancellation checks in long loops
  • Non-exhaustive when on sealed types
  • Large functions (>50 lines)
  • Deep nesting (>4 levels)

MEDIUM (Consider)

  • Non-idiomatic Kotlin (Java-style patterns)
  • Missing trailing commas
  • Scope function misuse or nesting
  • Missing sequence for large collection chains
  • Redundant explicit types

Automated Checks Run

# Build check
./gradlew build

# Static analysis
./gradlew detekt

# Formatting check
./gradlew ktlintCheck

# Tests
./gradlew test

Example Usage

User: /kotlin-review

Agent:
# Kotlin Code Review Report

## Files Reviewed
- src/main/kotlin/com/example/service/UserService.kt (modified)
- src/main/kotlin/com/example/routes/UserRoutes.kt (modified)

## Static Analysis Results
✓ Build: Successful
✓ detekt: No issues
⚠ ktlint: 2 formatting warnings

## Issues Found

[CRITICAL] Force-Unwrap Null Safety
File: src/main/kotlin/com/example/service/UserService.kt:28
Issue: Using !! on nullable repository result
```kotlin
val user = repository.findById(id)!!  // NPE risk
```
Fix: Use safe call with error handling
```kotlin
val user = repository.findById(id)
    ?: throw UserNotFoundException("User $id not found")
```

[HIGH] GlobalScope Usage
File: src/main/kotlin/com/example/routes/UserRoutes.kt:45
Issue: Using GlobalScope breaks structured concurrency
```kotlin
GlobalScope.launch {
    notificationService.sendWelcome(user)
}
```
Fix: Use the call's coroutine scope
```kotlin
launch {
    notificationService.sendWelcome(user)
}
```

## Summary
- CRITICAL: 1
- HIGH: 1
- MEDIUM: 0

Recommendation: ❌ Block merge until CRITICAL issue is fixed

Read the full file on GitHub · 148 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 148 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 0d245b80d107

Subscribe to this mod's changes

kotlin-review is a command published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes (270 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 917 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.