Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/kotlin-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00917 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00458 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
kotlin-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- kotlin-review — 88% identical, 7 lines differ
- kotlin-review — 86% identical, 17 lines differ
- kotlin-review — 86% identical, 17 lines differ
- kotlin-review — 86% identical, 19 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Kotlin Code Review
This command invokes the kotlin-reviewer agent for comprehensive Kotlin-specific code review.
What This Command Does
- Identify Kotlin Changes: Find modified
.ktand.ktsfiles viagit diff - Run Build & Static Analysis: Execute
./gradlew build,detekt,ktlintCheck - Security Scan: Check for SQL injection, command injection, hardcoded secrets
- Null Safety Review: Analyze
!!usage, platform type handling, unsafe casts - Coroutine Review: Check structured concurrency, dispatcher usage, cancellation
- Generate Report: Categorize issues by severity
When to Use
Use /kotlin-review when:
- After writing or modifying Kotlin code
- Before committing Kotlin changes
- Reviewing pull requests with Kotlin code
- Onboarding to a new Kotlin codebase
- Learning idiomatic Kotlin patterns
Review Categories
CRITICAL (Must Fix)
- SQL/Command injection vulnerabilities
- Force-unwrap
!!without justification - Platform type null safety violations
- GlobalScope usage (structured concurrency violation)
- Hardcoded credentials
- Unsafe deserialization
HIGH (Should Fix)
- Mutable state where immutable suffices
- Blocking calls inside coroutine context
- Missing cancellation checks in long loops
- Non-exhaustive
whenon sealed types - Large functions (>50 lines)
- Deep nesting (>4 levels)
MEDIUM (Consider)
- Non-idiomatic Kotlin (Java-style patterns)
- Missing trailing commas
- Scope function misuse or nesting
- Missing sequence for large collection chains
- Redundant explicit types
Automated Checks Run
# Build check
./gradlew build
# Static analysis
./gradlew detekt
# Formatting check
./gradlew ktlintCheck
# Tests
./gradlew test
Example Usage
User: /kotlin-review
Agent:
# Kotlin Code Review Report
## Files Reviewed
- src/main/kotlin/com/example/service/UserService.kt (modified)
- src/main/kotlin/com/example/routes/UserRoutes.kt (modified)
## Static Analysis Results
✓ Build: Successful
✓ detekt: No issues
⚠ ktlint: 2 formatting warnings
## Issues Found
[CRITICAL] Force-Unwrap Null Safety
File: src/main/kotlin/com/example/service/UserService.kt:28
Issue: Using !! on nullable repository result
```kotlin
val user = repository.findById(id)!! // NPE risk
```
Fix: Use safe call with error handling
```kotlin
val user = repository.findById(id)
?: throw UserNotFoundException("User $id not found")
```
[HIGH] GlobalScope Usage
File: src/main/kotlin/com/example/routes/UserRoutes.kt:45
Issue: Using GlobalScope breaks structured concurrency
```kotlin
GlobalScope.launch {
notificationService.sendWelcome(user)
}
```
Fix: Use the call's coroutine scope
```kotlin
launch {
notificationService.sendWelcome(user)
}
```
## Summary
- CRITICAL: 1
- HIGH: 1
- MEDIUM: 0
Recommendation: ❌ Block merge until CRITICAL issue is fixed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 148 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 0d245b80d107
kotlin-review is a command published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes (270 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 917 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
kotlin-review
Comprehensive Kotlin code review for idiomatic patterns, null safety, coroutine safety, and security. Invokes the kotlin-reviewer agent.
assemble-team
Assemble a pre-built agent team for parallel work - review, feature, debug, cross-platform, full-stack, or research.
rust-critique
Deep code critique — read the target Rust code and apply the full review process. Evaluates soundness, ownership, error handling, type design, async correctness, performance, and architecture. Think like a senior Rust engineer giving honest feedback.
rust-types
Strengthen the type system — replace primitive obsession with newtypes, booleans with enums, stringly-typed APIs with domain types. Make illegal states unrepresentable.
rust-polish
Final pre-merge polish — remove dead code, verify doc comments, clean clippy, check all Result paths, remove debug artifacts. The last 5% that takes 50% of the effort.
code-review
Review staged git changes for bugs, security issues, and style violations.