Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/spec-kit-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/spec-kit-zh/speckit.tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/spec-kit-zh/speckit.tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/spec-kit-zh/speckit.tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/loulanyue/spec-kit-zh/speckit.tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/loulanyue/spec-kit-zh/speckit.tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00141 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to speckit.tasks — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Outline
-
Read
.specify/feature.jsonto get the feature directory path. -
Load context:
.specify/memory/constitution.mdand<feature_directory>/spec.mdand<feature_directory>/plan.md. -
Create dependency-ordered implementation tasks and store them in
<feature_directory>/tasks.md.- Every task uses checklist format:
- [ ] [TaskID] Description with file path - Organized by phase: setup, foundational, user stories in priority order, polish
- Every task uses checklist format:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 20 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A b363acd5cdbc
speckit.tasks is a command published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/spec-kit-zh (337 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 141 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to speckit.tasks, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
ijfw-status
Show IJFW state -- mode, routing, memory, recent activity, codebase index, settings. Use when you want the at-a-glance banner you'd otherwise get at session start.
team
Manage your project's agent team. Usage: /team [setup|list|add|remove|swap].
workflow
Start or resume the IJFW project workflow. Usage: /workflow [discover|plan|execute|verify|ship|status].
implementation-plan
Define an incremental plan for the active task as IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN.md plus a TASKSTATE.md update: smallest safe slices with scope, validation and exit criteria. No code is written. A --spec mode derives slices from a spec or PRD. A retrofit mode annotates in-progress plans so they can adopt implement-fleet. Do not…
slice-closure
Decide whether the current slice is ready to close, separating slice completion from task completion, and record the result in slice notes and TASKSTATE.md. Use when a slice was implemented, validated or reviewed and may be ready to close. Do not use before slice implementation, during planning, or for overall task…
task-close
Close a whole finished task: verify the spec done-conditions, set TASKSTATE.md to its final closed state, and move the folder from active/ to archive/. Use when all slices are closed, the work is merged or explicitly waived, and the task is ending. Do not use for one slice (use slice-closure), unfinished work…