Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/inspectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LovelaceLoom/grok-plugin-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/inspect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/inspect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/inspect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00258 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00129 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
inspect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Wrap grok inspect. This is the most useful debugging tool when something feels "off" with /grok:rescue or /grok:review — it surfaces:
- Which AGENTS.md /
CLAUDE.md/.grok/GROK.mdrules will be appended to the system prompt - Which skills are autoloaded (from
~/.grok/skills/,~/.claude/skills/, and project-local) - Which MCP servers are configured
- Which plugins are active
- Permission rules currently in effect
- LSP integrations and hooks
Pass --json for a machine-readable dump.
Raw user input:
$ARGUMENTS
Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" inspect "$ARGUMENTS"
Output rules:
- Return the companion's stdout verbatim.
- The output is large for projects with many skills/MCPs — that's expected.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 31 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A a31384fba1dd
inspect is a command published in the GitHub repository LovelaceLoom/grok-plugin-cc (5 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 258 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
test-tools
Test MCP NixOS Tools (project).
composite-actions
Generate, review, secure, and test composite GitHub Actions following best practices — full repo scaffold, interview-driven generation, PR creation on existing repos, SHA pinning, secrets-as-inputs, job summaries, and actionlint validation.
github-actions
Design, review, secure, and debug GitHub Actions workflows — reusable workflows, OIDC federation, SHA pinning, token scoping, promotion orchestration, and CI failure diagnosis.
datadog
Set up and troubleshoot Datadog — Agent deployment on Kubernetes, APM instrumentation, Log Management, Monitors, Dashboards, SLOs, Synthetic tests, and live incident investigation using the Datadog MCP server. Covers Terraform-managed Datadog resources.
fluxcd
FluxCD entry point — routes to the right workflow based on what you need. Live cluster issue → structured 5-workflow debug trace. Repo health check → 6-phase audit (discovery, validation, API compliance, best practices, security). Helm chart review → helmchart. Starts by asking one question to confirm the right mode.
linkerd
Linkerd-specific diagnostics — mTLS verification, proxy injection issues, authorization policy debugging, traffic management, and multi-cluster connectivity problems.