Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/modelsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LovelaceLoom/grok-plugin-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/models)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/models"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lovelaceloom/grok-plugin-cc/models.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00198 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00099 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
models scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
List Grok's available models by running grok models and report which model the plugin will use in this workspace.
If the user passes --set-default <id> (or --set-default followed by a positional model id), persist that model into the workspace config so subsequent commands default to it.
Raw user input:
$ARGUMENTS
Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/companion.mjs" models "$ARGUMENTS"
Output rules:
- Return the companion's stdout verbatim.
- The footer lines (effective model, workspace-pinned, plugin default, env override) are useful even when there's only one public model today — they document the precedence chain.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 24 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 4169c0671153
models is a command published in the GitHub repository LovelaceLoom/grok-plugin-cc (5 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 198 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
test-tools
Test MCP NixOS Tools (project).
composite-actions
Generate, review, secure, and test composite GitHub Actions following best practices — full repo scaffold, interview-driven generation, PR creation on existing repos, SHA pinning, secrets-as-inputs, job summaries, and actionlint validation.
github-actions
Design, review, secure, and debug GitHub Actions workflows — reusable workflows, OIDC federation, SHA pinning, token scoping, promotion orchestration, and CI failure diagnosis.
datadog
Set up and troubleshoot Datadog — Agent deployment on Kubernetes, APM instrumentation, Log Management, Monitors, Dashboards, SLOs, Synthetic tests, and live incident investigation using the Datadog MCP server. Covers Terraform-managed Datadog resources.
fluxcd
FluxCD entry point — routes to the right workflow based on what you need. Live cluster issue → structured 5-workflow debug trace. Repo health check → 6-phase audit (discovery, validation, API compliance, best practices, security). Helm chart review → helmchart. Starts by asking one question to confirm the right mode.
linkerd
Linkerd-specific diagnostics — mTLS verification, proxy injection issues, authorization policy debugging, traffic management, and multi-cluster connectivity problems.