Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-cc/kimi-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-cc/kimi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/luanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-cc/kimi-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-cc/kimi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/luanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-cc/kimi-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00370 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
kimi:review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/kimi:review
Peer-review uncommitted changes or a branch diff. Read-only; no mutations.
Usage
/kimi:review
/kimi:review --base main
/kimi:review --background --base main
Process
-
Determine review target
- If
--base <ref>: capturegit diff <ref>...HEAD - Otherwise: capture
git diff(uncommitted changes)
- If
-
Load review prompt template
Read("plugins/kimi/prompts/review.md") -
Dispatch to Kimi via broker
Bash("node plugins/kimi/scripts/broker.mjs dispatch \ --prompt 'Review this diff: ...' \ --role explore \ --mode review \ [--background]") -
Parse and validate
- Parse JSON output.
- Validate against
schemas/review-output.schema.json. - Render findings with
renderReview().
Output
{
"summary": "string",
"findings": [
{"severity": "info|warning|critical", "file": "string", "line": 42, "message": "string", "suggestion": "string"}
]
}
Notes
- Uses
--role explore→ read-only by prompt contract (theroles/explore.mdprompt forbids writes and mutating shell commands). - Validates output against JSON schema for consistency.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0f731c0a877b
kimi:review is a command published in the GitHub repository luanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-cc (14 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 370 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
kimi:review compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kimi:reviewluanmorenommaciel/kimi-plugin-cc | Command | 14 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| diff-reviewcoco-research/coco | Command | 630 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| review-branchdamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 116 | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| initazrtydxb/procoder | Command | 211 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| refactorRchGrav/claudebox | Command | 1.2k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | today | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |
| merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | today | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |