Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/revisar-uigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luanpdd/kit-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/revisar-ui)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/revisar-ui"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/revisar-ui.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00212 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
revisar-ui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
<execution_context> @./.claude/framework/workflows/ui-review.md @./.claude/framework/references/ui-brand.md </execution_context>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 33 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 35a9766a22eb
revisar-ui is a command published in the GitHub repository luanpdd/kit-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 212 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
/a11y-audit
Auditoría de accesibilidad WCAG 2.2 completa con escaneo de HTML/componentes. Detecta: alt text faltante, problemas de contraste, navegación por teclado, etiquetas ARIA, gestión de focus, jerarquía de encabezados, etiquetas de formularios. Genera reporte accionable con instrucciones de remediación.
ux-recommend
The v2 flagship. Runs the 5-parallel-search Python engine across 11 data manifests (75+ styles, 170+ palettes, 65+ type pairs, 120+ components, 170+ industries, 110+ UX laws, 50+ motion presets, 120+ anti-patterns, 92 brand specs) and returns a complete recommended design system for your project — with always-on…
review-css-complexity
Scan codebase for overly complex CSS/styling patterns that should be simplified.
color-specialist
Use when colour is failing. Contrast below AA, a palette with no system behind it, dark mode that is only inverted light mode, or semantic colours that carry no meaning.
responsive-design-specialist
Use when a layout breaks between sizes. Arbitrary breakpoints, type that does not scale, images that blow out the grid, or a desktop design retrofitted onto mobile.
wcag-audit
Accessibility audit based on WCAG 2.1/2.2 and the axe-core reference.