Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luanpdd/kit-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/verificar-trabalho)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/verificar-trabalho"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/verificar-trabalho/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/verificar-trabalho"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/luanpdd/kit-mcp/verificar-trabalho.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00686 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00343 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
verificar-trabalho scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Propósito: Confirmar que o que o Claude construiu realmente funciona da perspectiva do usuário. Um teste por vez, respostas em texto simples, sem interrogatório. Quando problemas são encontrados, automaticamente diagnostica, planeja correções e prepara para execução.
Saída: {phase_num}-UAT.md rastreando todos os resultados de teste. Se problemas encontrados: lacunas diagnosticadas, planos de correção verificados prontos para /executar-fase
<execution_context> @./.claude/framework/workflows/verify-work.md @./.claude/framework/templates/UAT.md </execution_context>
Arquivos de contexto são resolvidos dentro do workflow (init verify-work) e delegados via blocos <files_to_read>.
<observability_integration> Integração com Core Analysis Loop em logs reais (v1.9):
Quando workflow.observability_uat_validation = true (default) e o projeto tem MCP Supabase disponível, o workflow inclui passo de validação observacional após UAT conversacional:
- Para cada test passing no UAT, invocar o agente
incident-investigatorem modo "validation":Task(subagent_type="incident-investigator", prompt=" mode: validation symptom: validar que feature de Phase {N} efetivamente emitiu spans/eventos esperados time_window: última 1h expected_attributes: {result.success: true, build_id: {current_build}} ") - O agente queryará via
mcp__supabase__get_logsoumcp__supabase__execute_sqlpara confirmar:- Spans com nome esperado existem
- Atributos canônicos foram emitidos (não só código existe — comportamento real)
result.successbaseline está dentro do esperado
- Se confirmado: UAT.md inclui evidência observacional (não só "funciona em UI"). Status
passed✓. - Se ausente: UAT.md flag
human_neededcom sugestão "verificar instrumentação não está pegando".
Skill consultada: core-analysis-loop — para o caso de UAT falhar e precisar investigar.
REQ: INT-FW-03. </observability_integration>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 65 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 5f2c6704691f
verificar-trabalho is a command published in the GitHub repository luanpdd/kit-mcp (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 686 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
paul:verify
Guide manual user acceptance testing of recently built features.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
ui-snapshot.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
laravel-playwright
E2E Playwright patterns; use the laravel:e2e-playwright skill exactly as written.
qa
Smoke or browser-walk a running app. Report only. Do not implement. Do not merge.
verify-pr
Verify a PR's frontend changes through browser automation.