Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform/kimi-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00040 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00020 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00008 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
kimi-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Kimi Review
Run node "$HOME/.kimi-plugin/kimi-companion.mjs" review, then present the findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 8 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A ef6b0d7b5131
kimi-review is a command published in the GitHub repository luhfilho/kimi-plugin-cross-platform (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 40 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review.v1
Review code changes: /review [commit|branch|PR].
pr-review
Generate a PR review report aggregating quality scan, coverage, complexity, and breaking changes.
code-simplify
A code-review command that simplifies recently changed code or another chosen scope while preserving its behavior.
review
A command that reviews code changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.
arckit.dld-review
Review Detailed Design (DLD) for implementation readiness.
cpp-review
Comprehensive C++ code review for memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and security. Invokes the cpp-reviewer agent.