Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m-binimran/design-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00102 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00051 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
asset-qa-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/asset-qa-reviewer $ARGUMENTS
Launch the asset-qa-reviewer subagent to review: $ARGUMENTS
If no target is specified, review the most recent changes (run git diff). Relay the subagent's findings,
grouped by severity, with its verdict.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 11 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 41b3809e460a
asset-qa-reviewer is a command published in the GitHub repository m-binimran/design-pack (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 102 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
canva
Main command for Canva operations. Routes to appropriate skill based on request. Use when user explicitly requests Canva design creation.
canva
Main command for Canva operations. Routes to appropriate skill based on request.
profile
Save, load, inspect, update, reset, or delete diagram-design client profiles.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
ppt-image2-editable-rebuild
Rebuild image2 or imagegen reference slides as editable PowerPoint decks.
responsive-design-specialist
Use when a layout breaks between sizes. Arbitrary breakpoints, type that does not scale, images that blow out the grid, or a desktop design retrofitted onto mobile.