Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MadAppGang/claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/madappgang/claude-code/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/madappgang/claude-code/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/madappgang/claude-code/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/madappgang/claude-code/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/madappgang/claude-code/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.03505 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01402 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00701 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00350 |
Grade A, and why
conductor-implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 465 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<user_request> $ARGUMENTS </user_request>
<status_progression>
Task status MUST follow this progression:
- [ ] (pending) - Not started
- [~] (in_progress) - Currently working
- [x] (complete) - Finished
- [!] (blocked) - Blocked by issue
Only ONE task can be [~] at a time.
</status_progression>
<tdd_workflow>
Follow Test-Driven Development for each task:
**Red Phase:**
1. Create test file for the feature
2. Write tests defining expected behavior
3. Run tests - confirm they FAIL
4. Do NOT proceed until tests fail
**Green Phase:**
1. Write MINIMUM code to pass tests
2. Run tests - confirm they PASS
3. No refactoring yet
**Refactor Phase:**
1. Improve code clarity and performance
2. Remove duplication
3. Run tests - confirm they still PASS
</tdd_workflow>
<git_commit_protocol>
After completing each task:
1. Stage relevant changes
2. Commit with proper format:
```
<type>(<scope>): <description>
- Detail 1
- Detail 2
Task: {phase}.{task}
```
3. Attach git note with task summary:
```bash
git notes add -m "Task: {phase}.{task} - {title}
Summary: {what was accomplished}
Files Changed:
- {file1}: {description}
Why: {business reason}" $(git log -1 --format="%H")
```
4. Update metadata.json with commit SHA
</git_commit_protocol>
<commit_types>
| Type | Use For |
|------|---------|
| feat | New feature |
| fix | Bug fix |
| docs | Documentation |
| style | Formatting |
| refactor | Code restructuring |
| test | Adding tests |
| chore | Maintenance |
| perf | Performance |
</commit_types>
<workflow_adherence>
ALWAYS follow procedures in conductor/workflow.md:
- TDD Red/Green/Refactor cycle
- Quality gates (>80% coverage, linting)
- Document deviations in tech-stack.md
- Phase Completion Protocol at phase end
</workflow_adherence>
<human_approval_gates>
Pause and ask for user approval:
- Before starting each new phase
- When encountering blockers
- Before marking phase complete
- During Phase Completion Protocol Step 5
</human_approval_gates>
</critical_constraints>
<core_principles> Focus on exactly one task. Complete it fully before moving to next. No partial implementations.
<principle name="Test First" priority="critical">
Write failing tests BEFORE implementation.
This is the Red phase of TDD.
Never skip this step.
</principle>
<principle name="Continuous Status Updates" priority="critical">
Update plan.md status immediately when:
- Starting a task ([~])
- Completing a task ([x])
- Encountering a blocker ([!] with note)
</principle>
<principle name="Traceable Commits" priority="high">
Every commit links to track/task.
Commit messages follow type convention.
Git notes provide audit trail.
</principle>
</core_principles>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 465 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A fd65128dc9b2
conductor-implement is a command published in the GitHub repository MadAppGang/claude-code (287 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 3,505 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
check
Run project checks and fix any errors without committing.
act
Follow RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle approach for test-driven development.
implement
Execute all implementation tasks from tasks.md with test-driven development, parallel batching, and atomic commits.
build
Invoke the agent-skills:incremental-implementation skill alongside agent-skills:test-driven-development.
implement-revalidate
Read by /implement when the user asks to re-validate (D-CMD-REF-HAND).
plan-execute
Execute a validated plan: worktree isolation, TDD scaffolding, level-based parallel agents, quality gate with smoke test, PR creation and merge. Handles everything through to merged PR.