Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MadAppGang/magusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/madappgang/magus/snapshot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/madappgang/magus/snapshot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/madappgang/magus/snapshot/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/madappgang/magus/snapshot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/madappgang/magus/snapshot.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00472 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00189 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
snapshot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/terminal:snapshot
Advanced command — for most tasks, use
/terminal:observeinstead; it lists slots and captures them in one step. Use this command for raw capture control.
Reads the current screen content of a slot exactly as a person would see it in that terminal.
Usage
/terminal:snapshot [slot] [--lines N] [--visual]
slotdefaults to 1.--lines Nincludes the last N lines of scrollback above the viewport.--visualreturns a rendered image of the pane instead of text.
How to Use
Snapshot a slot
/terminal:snapshot 2
→ mcp__plugin_terminal_mux__capture-pane({ slot: 2 })
→ text content; structuredContent { "slot": 2 }
Snapshot with scrollback
/terminal:snapshot 1 --lines 200
→ mcp__plugin_terminal_mux__capture-pane({ slot: 1, lines: 200 })
Visual snapshot
/terminal:snapshot 2 --visual
→ mcp__plugin_terminal_mux__screenshot-pane({ slot: 2 })
Renders the pane as an image, useful for TUI layouts where text capture loses structure.
Errors
A slot that was never opened is an error (slot 2 does not exist; open it with open-pane or by running something in it, per spec). capture-pane is a reading tool: it never creates a pane. mcp__plugin_terminal_mux__list-slots shows which slots exist.
Notes
- For output longer than the viewport,
--lines 200, or pipe the command's output to a file andReadit. - For monitoring that waits for a change, use
/terminal:observe {slot} --watchinstead.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -21 lines · +22 tokens per session 722491bf26bf
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 45335aa74ef6
snapshot is a command published in the GitHub repository MadAppGang/magus (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 472 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.