Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mahmoudilyan/marmouiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mahmoudilyan/marmoui/marmo-build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mahmoudilyan/marmoui/marmo-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mahmoudilyan/marmoui/marmo-build/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mahmoudilyan/marmoui/marmo-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mahmoudilyan/marmoui/marmo-build.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00370 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00185 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
marmo-build scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/marmo-ui:marmo-ui-build
Build UI using @marmoui/ui (Marmo's internal design system) and the marmo-ui MCP server bundled with this plugin. Run the full validated workflow regardless of how simple the request looks. Works in any Marmo product repo.
Steps
- Call
mcp__marmo-ui__get_knowledge_versionand log the result. - Ask the user which icon library they want (default:
phosphor/ Phosphor Icons; alsomaterial,lucide,tabler,heroicons,feather). Then callmcp__marmo-ui__get_design_guidelineswith thaticonLibrary. - If the user's request matches a known pattern, call
mcp__marmo-ui__get_patternwith the closestpatternId(and the sameiconLibrary). Otherwise callmcp__marmo-ui__search_componentswith relevant keywords, thenmcp__marmo-ui__get_component_infofor each component selected. - Write the code. UI imports only from
@marmoui/ui; icons only from the chosen library (use the icon name map returned byget_design_guidelines). - Call
mcp__marmo-ui__review_generated_codeon the final output with the sameiconLibrary. Fix all errors (wrong-library icon imports are errors). Re-run untilvalid: true. - Return the code with a one-line note describing which pattern/components and icon library were used.
User request
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 21 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 3e6ab7a8eb17
marmo-build is a command published in the GitHub repository mahmoudilyan/marmoui (41 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 370 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
design-screen
Design a complete screen layout from a description or requirements.
responsive-audit
Audit a design's responsive behaviour across breakpoints — layout, touch targets, and content reflow.
ux-fix
Opt-in fix loop. Reads the latest report from .ux/, validates working tree, and applies findings as atomic commits via the right sub-agents. Triggers on "fix the findings", "apply the fixes", or "run the fix loop". Use when applying findings from a previous audit / copy / a11y / motion / polish report, the user says…
ux-motion
Animation and motion rubric. Checks timing, easing, meaning, reduced-motion compliance, and performance for every animation on a surface. Triggers on "motion check", "are the animations good", or "fix the motion". Use when auditing motion or animations, checking durations / easing / reduced-motion / performance, is…
ux-component
Generate a single component (button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart) from a spec. Triggers on "build a [component]", "create a pricing card", "make a modal", "add a navbar". Use when generating a single component, the user says "create a [button/modal/navbar/card/table/form/chart]", embedded into an…
ux-copy
Microcopy review and rewrite against the voice rubric. Produces a before/after table with severity per string and a clean rewrite block. Triggers on "review the copy", "fix the microcopy", "the error messages are bad", or "rewrite this". Use when reviewing or rewriting microcopy, fixing error messages that sound like…