customer-feedback-framework

A framework for collecting and managing customer feedback through surveys, interviews, feature requests, and feedback analysis. It explains measures such as NPS, CSAT, and CES, which assess loyalty, satisfaction, and customer effort.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to design customer surveys, plan interviews, analyze satisfaction and effort, prioritize feature requests, close the loop with customers, and create a 90-day feedback program.
Why use it?
It gives teams a structured way to gather customer opinions, identify churn causes, prioritize requests, and follow up on feedback.

Command

Part of the stratarts plugin — 27 commands shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/maigentic/stratarts/customer-feedback-framework
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maigentic/stratarts

Or install stratarts, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 27 commands.

Per session 49 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 8,879 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00049 $0.08879
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.04439
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.01776
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00888

Measured 3d ago against content hash 87f00ccdc812, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

customer-feedback-framework scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

stratarts/commands/customer-feedback-framework.md · 870 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 870 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

customer-feedback-framework

Step 0: Pre-Generation Verification

IMPORTANT: Before generating the HTML output, verify you have gathered data for ALL required placeholders:

Header & Score Banner Placeholders

  • {{BUSINESS_NAME}} - Company/product name
  • {{DATE}} - Generation date
  • {{NPS_SCORE}} - Current NPS score
  • {{CSAT_SCORE}} - Current CSAT percentage
  • {{CES_SCORE}} - Current CES score (1-5)
  • {{SURVEY_COUNT}} - Number of survey types deployed
  • {{INTERVIEW_COUNT}} - Monthly interview target
  • {{FRAMEWORK_STATUS}} - Status verdict (e.g., "VOICE OF CUSTOMER")

Metrics Overview Placeholders

  • {{METRICS_OVERVIEW}} - 4 metric cards with current/target values

NPS Section Placeholders

  • {{NPS_CADENCE}} - Survey cadence (Quarterly/Transactional)
  • {{NPS_FOLLOWUPS}} - 3 follow-up cards (Promoters, Passives, Detractors)

CSAT/CES Section Placeholders

  • {{CSAT_TOUCHPOINTS}} - Active touchpoints for CSAT
  • {{CES_TOUCHPOINTS}} - Active touchpoints for CES

Exit Survey Placeholders

  • {{EXIT_RESPONSE_RATE}} - Response rate percentage
  • {{CHURN_REASONS}} - 6 churn reasons with percentages and addressability

Close the Loop Placeholders

  • {{LOOP_PROCESS}} - 3 process cards (Detractors, Passives, Promoters)

User Interviews Placeholders

  • {{INTERVIEW_TYPES}} - Interview types with monthly counts
  • {{INTERVIEW_DURATION}} - Interview length
  • {{INTERVIEW_SCRIPT}} - Script sections with questions

Feature Requests Placeholders

  • {{FEATURE_CHANNELS}} - Collection channel items
  • {{RICE_TABLE_ROWS}} - Feature requests with RICE scores

Feedback Themes Placeholders

  • {{FEEDBACK_THEMES}} - Theme cards with mentions, trends, actions

Roadmap Placeholders

  • {{ROADMAP_PHASES}} - 3 phase cards

Chart Data Placeholders

  • {{NPS_LABELS}} - JSON array (Promoters, Passives, Detractors)
  • {{NPS_DATA}} - JSON array (percentages)
  • {{THEMES_LABELS}} - JSON array (theme names)
  • {{THEMES_DATA}} - JSON array (mention counts)
  • {{TRENDS_LABELS}} - JSON array (months)
  • {{CSAT_TREND_DATA}} - JSON array (CSAT percentages)
  • {{CES_TREND_DATA}} - JSON array (CES scores)
  • {{VOLUME_LABELS}} - JSON array (months)
  • {{NPS_VOLUME_DATA}} - JSON array (NPS responses)
  • {{CSAT_VOLUME_DATA}} - JSON array (CSAT responses)
  • {{EXIT_VOLUME_DATA}} - JSON array (exit responses)

Read the full file on GitHub · 870 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 870 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 87f00ccdc812

Subscribe to this mod's changes

customer-feedback-framework is a command published in the GitHub repository maigentic/stratarts (39 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 8,879 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.