Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maigentic/stratartsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/maigentic/stratarts/investor-brief-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/maigentic/stratarts/investor-brief-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/maigentic/stratarts/investor-brief-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/maigentic/stratarts/investor-brief-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/maigentic/stratarts/investor-brief-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.06436 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.03218 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00644 |
Grade A, and why
investor-brief-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 681 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
investor-brief-writer
Mission: Create a compelling investor brief (one-pager or executive summary) that captures attention, communicates your opportunity concisely, and gets investors to take a meeting. Distill your pitch deck into a scannable, high-impact document for email outreach and follow-ups.
STEP 0: Pre-Generation Verification
Before generating HTML output, verify all placeholders are populated:
Score Banner Placeholders
-
{{COMPANY_NAME}}- Company name -
{{ROUND_NAME}}- Round type (Pre-Seed/Seed/Series A) -
{{TIMESTAMP}}- Generation timestamp -
{{RAISE_AMOUNT}}- Target raise amount (e.g., "$2.5M") -
{{MRR}}- Current MRR (e.g., "$85K") -
{{GROWTH_RATE}}- MoM growth rate (e.g., "22%") -
{{CUSTOMERS}}- Customer count (e.g., "156") -
{{TAM}}- Total addressable market (e.g., "$47B") -
{{TARGET_INVESTORS}}- Target investor count (e.g., "100")
Content Section Placeholders
-
{{EXEC_SUMMARY_CARDS}}- 4 exec summary cards (format, audience, distribution, differentiators) -
{{TAGLINE}}- Company tagline (1 line) -
{{CONTACT_INFO}}- Contact information (email, website, location) -
{{ONEPAGER_SECTIONS}}- 6-8 one-pager sections (problem, solution, market, advantage, traction, ask) -
{{TRACTION_CARDS}}- 4 traction metric cards with growth indicators -
{{TEAM_CARDS}}- 3 team member cards (name, title, bio) -
{{EMAIL_SUBJECT}}- Cold email subject line -
{{EMAIL_BODY}}- Cold email body (4 paragraphs) -
{{EMAIL_TEMPLATES}}- 3 email templates (warm intro, follow-up, post-meeting) -
{{DISTRIBUTION_CARDS}}- 3 distribution strategy cards -
{{INVESTOR_ROWS}}- 5-10 investor table rows -
{{NEXT_STEPS}}- 6 prioritized next step items
Chart Data Placeholders
-
{{REVENUE_LABELS}}- JSON array of month labels -
{{REVENUE_DATA}}- JSON array of MRR values
STEP 1: Detect Previous Context
Ideal Context (All Present):
- investor-pitch-deck-builder → Full pitch deck content (problem, solution, market, traction, team, ask)
- problem-validation-study → Problem statement, customer pain points
- metrics-dashboard-designer → Traction metrics (MRR, growth rate, customers)
- financial-model-architect → Financial projections, unit economics
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 681 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 8c08d9a70ccb
investor-brief-writer is a command published in the GitHub repository maigentic/stratarts (41 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 6,436 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
psql-query
Run ad-hoc PostgreSQL analytics queries against dev/test database.
discover
Run a full product discovery cycle — from outcome definition through opportunity mapping, prioritisation, and experiment design. Use when the team isn't sure what to build next, or before writing a PRD for a complex feature space.
ccr
CCR (Compressed Context with Retrieval) — recall the full original of context that greatcto compressed/filtered out, by its short id. The retrieval half of the compression layer.
coding-audit
Medical-coding / revenue-cycle compliance audit. Invokes rcm-reviewer to assess autonomous ICD-10-CM / CPT / HCPCS coding for False Claims Act exposure (upcoding/unbundling), NCCI edits + MUEs, medical necessity (LCD/NCD), modifier discipline, HIPAA minimum-necessary — and force a certified-coder (CPC/CCS) sign-off.
tax-review
Tax-filing compliance check — invokes tax-reviewer to produce TM-tax-{slug}.md with MeF e-file schema, Form 8879, PTIN/Circular 230, and IRC §7216 consent gaps.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.