run-architecture-review

run-architecture-review is a command for Claude Code from manishiitg/coding-agent-loop. It costs 0 tokens per session (230 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A background architecture-review task for checking a software system's structure and design.

In plain words
What is it for?
Starting an architecture review as a background task and presenting its result when complete.
Why use it?
It lets the chat stay responsive while the review runs. The description does not specify what the review checks or how it reports results.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

Good fit Starting an architecture review as a background task and presenting its result when complete.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/run-architecture-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for run-architecture-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/run-architecture-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/run-architecture-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/run-architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/run-architecture-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for run-architecture-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/run-architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/run-architecture-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 230 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00230
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00092
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00046
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00023

Measured 23d ago against content hash 0c9ded33956c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

run-architecture-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agent_go/internal/agentworksproduct/commands/run-architecture-review.md · 9 lines

What it actually says

Run the /run-architecture-review pass as a BACKGROUND task so this chat stays responsive. If the run_in_background tool is available: call run_in_background with name "Architecture review", completion_mode "present_result", and this instruction:

First call record_pulse_result(module="architecture_review", pulse_run_id="current", result="running", note_only=true, manual=true, reason="Manual Architecture Review: {{context}}"). If another Pulse pass owns the module, report that collision and stop. Otherwise load read_skill(skills=[{"name":"builder-reference","path":"references/architecture-review.md"}]) and follow it exactly as a read-only review, with this focus: {{context}}. Persist findings, decisions and one terminal architecture_review result with its focuses through the typed Pulse tools. Do not edit the workflow, run steps or write a separate review file.

Do NOT perform the review yourself this turn — you'll get a presentation-only completion notification, then present the design options found, their expected value and tradeoffs, and the decisions waiting for the user. If run_in_background is not available, perform the review inline using these same instructions.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 23d ago First seen · 9 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0c9ded33956c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

run-architecture-review is a command published in the GitHub repository manishiitg/coding-agent-loop (13 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 230 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.