Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/marazii/research-co-pilot/replicategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Marazii/research-co-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/marazii/research-co-pilot/replicate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/marazii/research-co-pilot/replicate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/marazii/research-co-pilot/replicate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00294 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00147 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
replicate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the replication-designer skill from the research-co-pilot plugin and execute its full workflow.
The skill file is at skills/replication-designer/SKILL.md relative to this plugin. Read it and follow it precisely — including:
- Phase 1: Intake (target study, replication type — direct / close / conceptual / generalization / robustness — constraints, goal).
- Phase 2: Extract the original design into a structured spec.
- Phase 3: Decide what to hold equivalent vs update; document each deviation.
- Phase 4: Sample size for adequate replication power (often 2-3x the original).
- Phase 5: Pre-registration plan (OSF, AsPredicted, ClinicalTrials.gov).
- Phase 6: Multi-site logistics if applicable.
- Phase 7: Pre-specify replication-success criterion (significance + effect-size CI overlap + meta-analytic synthesis + equivalence test).
- Phase 8: Output
replication_design_<short_title>.md.
Frame as "estimate the effect honestly," not "prove it wrong."
User input: $ARGUMENTS
If no target study was given, ask for the citation / DOI / path to the paper and the replication intent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 24 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 6ba97656efcc
replicate is a command published in the GitHub repository Marazii/research-co-pilot (13 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 294 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
ars-lit-review
ARS academic-paper lit-review mode — annotated bibliography in paper format.
ars-plan
ARS academic-paper plan mode — Socratic chapter-by-chapter planning.
ars-revision-coach
ARS academic-paper revision-coach — peer-review roadmap or source-accounted real-committee response skeleton.
factcheck
Verify BibTeX entries and cited claims against DBLP and web sources. Checks author names, venues, years, and specific numerical claims.
ars-3w
ARS deep-research three-way-scan mode — WHY / HOW / WHAT paper comparison.
ars-citation-check
ARS academic-paper citation-check mode — citation error report.