Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/marcoemrich/exact-coding-exercises/redgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcoemrich/EXACT-Coding-ExercisesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00979 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00490 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
red scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD Red Phase
You are now in the Red Phase of TDD. Follow these instructions to activate ONE test and make it fail.
Your Mission
- Activate exactly ONE test from the test list
- Make explicit predictions about how it will fail
- Verify the test fails for the right reason
- Maintain strict discipline - NO implementation during Red phase
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Red Phase Rules
- One test at a time: Convert exactly ONE
it.todo()to executable test - All other tests remain as
it.todo(): Never have more than one failing test - Two-stage failure: First compilation error, then runtime/assertion error
- Make predictions: Explicitly state expected failures before running tests
- No implementation: Don't write code to make test pass yet
Process
Step 1: Activate One Test
Identify the next it.todo() and convert it to executable test code:
// Convert from:
it.todo("should return 0 for empty input");
// To:
it("should return 0 for empty input", () => {
expect(calculate("")).toBe(0);
});
Leave all other tests as it.todo().
Step 2: Predict Compilation Error
Before running the test, state your prediction:
🔴 Red Phase - Compilation Error Prediction:
- Test: "should return 0 for empty input"
- Expected: Compilation error
- Reason: Function `calculate` doesn't exist yet
- Error: "Cannot find name 'calculate'"
Step 3: Run Test - Verify Compilation Error
Run npm test and verify:
- ✅ Compilation error as predicted, OR
- ❌ Prediction wrong → follow the Prediction Failure Protocol below
Step 4: Create Empty Function
Create minimal function stub (no logic):
export const calculate = (input: string): number => {
return undefined as unknown as number; // Intentionally wrong
};
Step 5: Predict Runtime Error
Before running again, state your prediction:
🔴 Red Phase - Runtime Error Prediction:
- Test: "should return 0 for empty input"
- Expected: Runtime assertion error
- Expected value: 0
- Actual value: undefined
- Diff:
Expected: 0
Received: undefined
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 152 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A fb4478bb6f11
red is a command published in the GitHub repository marcoemrich/EXACT-Coding-Exercises (13 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 979 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
tdd-requirements
TDD開発の要件整理を行います。機能要件を明確化し、テスト駆動開発のための準備を行います。.
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
pm-auto-design2dev
設計レビューから実装完了まで完全自動化(設計レビュー→作業計画→TDD実装).
task-verify
PitWay: Run an inprogress task's approved verification command and persist evidence.
execute-plan
Execute an implementation plan methodically with TDD and continuous validation.
tdd
强制执行测试驱动开发工作流。首先搭建接口,生成测试,然后从实现能通过测试的最小代码。确保 80%+ 的覆盖率。.