learnings-review

learnings-review is a command for Claude Code from MarioEpkOne/PipelineIQ. It costs 0 tokens per session (3,326 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review workflow for turning notes in learnings.md into reusable project instructions or general commands. A knowledge base is a collection of such project-specific guidance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to classify lessons, update command or project knowledge-base files, curate existing entries, and record what was promoted or archived.
Why use it?
It prevents useful lessons from remaining in one notes file and separates advice that applies everywhere from advice meant only for one project.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the pipelineiq plugin — 10 commands, 6 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to classify lessons, update command or project knowledge-base files, curate existing entries, and record what was promoted or archived.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/marioepkone/pipelineiq/learnings-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MarioEpkOne/PipelineIQ

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install pipelineiq, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 10 commands, 6 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for learnings-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/marioepkone/pipelineiq/learnings-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/marioepkone/pipelineiq/learnings-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/marioepkone/pipelineiq/learnings-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/marioepkone/pipelineiq/learnings-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for learnings-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/marioepkone/pipelineiq/learnings-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/marioepkone/pipelineiq/learnings-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,326 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.03326
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01663
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00665
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00333

Measured 11d ago against content hash d1f99a2fe9f9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

learnings-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/learnings-review.md · 225 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review learnings.md, classify each entry as universal or project-specific, route approved entries to commands/*.md or project KB files, curate existing KB entries, and archive everything to promotion-log.md.

The user's request is: $ARGUMENTS

Step 1 -- Read learnings.md

Read learnings.md at the project root. If running from a project other than PipelineIQ, locate PipelineIQ's root by finding where commands/pipeline.md is installed and resolving upward. If empty or contains only headers with no entries, tell the user and stop.

Parse all entries. Group by severity tier (HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW). Number them 1, 2, 3... for reference throughout this workflow, ordered by severity (HIGH first, then MEDIUM, then LOW) and within each tier by occurrence count (highest first).

Step 1.5 -- Detect target project context

Determine whether project-specific routing is available:

  • Check if the current working directory (target project root) has a .claude/ directory
  • Check if the target project root has a CLAUDE.md file
  • If neither .claude/ nor CLAUDE.md exists: set PROJECT_KB_AVAILABLE = false, warn the user ("Project-specific routing unavailable -- no .claude/ directory or CLAUDE.md found. All learnings will be treated as universal pipeline improvements."), proceed with universal-only workflow
  • If .claude/ exists but CLAUDE.md does not: project-specific routing is partially available -- agent-specific KB files CAN be created in .claude/pipeline-kb/ but project-wide gotchas cannot be routed to CLAUDE.md. Warn user about the limitation.
  • If both exist: set PROJECT_KB_AVAILABLE = true, read any existing .claude/pipeline-kb/*.md files for the curation step

Step 2 -- Analyze each entry against the codebase

For each entry, in order of severity (HIGH first):

  • Read the target file referenced in Suggested diff
  • Verify the diff still applies (the old text exists in the file at roughly the expected location)
  • Check whether the problem described actually exists in the current command file
  • Assess whether the suggested change would conflict with or contradict existing logic
  • Check the real benefit: Is this a meaningful improvement, or cosmetic/trivial?
  • If the diff is stale (old text not found in target file), attempt to regenerate it by re-reading the target file and the suggestion. If unable to generate a valid diff, mark as "stale -- needs manual review"
  • If the problem described in the learning has already been fixed in the current file, mark as "Already resolved" with evidence (cite the line/section where the fix exists)

Read the full file on GitHub · 225 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 225 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d1f99a2fe9f9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

learnings-review is a command published in the GitHub repository MarioEpkOne/PipelineIQ (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,326 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.