Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/martian56/claude-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/martian56/claude-engineer/engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/martian56/claude-engineer/engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/martian56/claude-engineer/engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/martian56/claude-engineer/engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/martian56/claude-engineer/engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00483 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/claude-engineer:engineer - guided lifecycle
Drive a full greenfield project from idea to a tested, documented, CI-ready app. Follow the stages in order; do not skip the plan sign-off gate. Invoke the named skills (don't freelance a stage).
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, treat it as the starting brief or a path to one.
Run these stages in order
- Conventions & scaffold -
claude-engineer:project-conventions, thenclaude-engineer:monorepo-and-toolingandclaude-engineer:docker-dev-environmentfor the skeleton. - Intake -
claude-engineer:intake-project(refine/created brief; usessuperpowers:brainstorming). - Plan -
claude-engineer:plan-project(phaseddocs/plan/*; usessuperpowers:writing-plans). STOP for the user's explicit sign-off before any build. - Memory -
claude-engineer:project-memory(init.claude-engineer/state). - Build (autonomous) -
claude-engineer:execute-buildin CX-first order:design-system→frontend-development→backend-development→ integration. Orchestrate withsuperpowers:subagent-driven-development(each task usessuperpowers:test-driven-development). - Quality -
claude-engineer:testing-and-quality(run the four gates; verify with evidence). - CI & finish -
claude-engineer:ci-cd-pipeline, thensuperpowers:finishing-a-development-branch.
Rules
- Plan-gated then autonomous: after sign-off, run to completion; stop only on genuine blockers.
- Update
.claude-engineer/progress.mdafter each task andmemory.mdon each decision. - Nothing is "done" until all four quality gates pass with fresh evidence.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A f7543bbc75f2
engineer is a command published in the GitHub repository martian56/claude-engineer (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 483 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
fidelity
Measure how faithfully a clone reproduces a site — pixel-diff plus motion-fidelity into one 0-100 score, a letter grade, a ranked correction plan, and a shareable card.
apex
APEX Methodology - The systematic Analyze-Plan-Execute-eLicit-eXamine approach for intelligent development. Reduces hallucination and defect risk through mandatory parallel research, self-review, and validation gates.
test
Test commit. Use for add tests, update tests, test coverage, unit test, spec.
improve-test-quality
Analyze and improve existing test quality with better assertions, coverage, and maintainability.
test-gap-analysis
Identify untested code paths and missing test coverage across the codebase.
validate
Mechanically validate the sonu plugin repo before a PR — manifest sync, YAML frontmatter, shell-fence syntax, named-source and AI-attribution scans, cross-reference integrity, skill reachability. Only meaningful inside the claude-plugins repo; in any other repo, say so and stop.