Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to matheusbrramos/ProductFlow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/matheusbrramos/ProductFlow/main/.claude/commands/pf-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matheusbrramos/ProductFlowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/matheusbrramos/productflow/pf-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/matheusbrramos/productflow/pf-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/matheusbrramos/productflow/pf-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/matheusbrramos/productflow/pf-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/matheusbrramos/productflow/pf-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00721 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
pf-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pf-review - Revisao de Qualidade
Aciona o agente Supervisor para revisar artefatos.
Entrada
$ARGUMENTS
Se nenhum argumento for fornecido, perguntar o que revisar.
Acoes Disponiveis
/pf-review
Revisao completa de um artefato especifico.
O que fazer:
- Ler o artefato
- Aplicar checklist apropriado (PRD, story, battlecard, etc)
- Verificar criterios: completude, clareza, evidencia, testabilidade, consistencia
- Identificar issues por severidade
- Sugerir correcoes especificas
/pf-review consistency
Verifica consistencia entre todos os artefatos do projeto.
O que fazer:
- Listar todos os artefatos existentes
- Verificar alinhamento entre eles
- Identificar contradicoes
- Criar matriz de consistencia
/pf-review gaps
Lista todos os gaps e pendencias.
O que fazer:
- Verificar [PLACEHOLDER] nao resolvidos
- Verificar [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] pendentes
- Identificar informacoes faltantes
- Listar por severidade
/pf-review ready
Verifica se projeto esta pronto para aprovacao.
O que fazer:
- Executar todos os checklists
- Verificar bloqueadores criticos
- Listar pendencias
- Dar recomendacao final
Criterios de Revisao
| Criterio | Pergunta |
|---|---|
| Completude | Falta alguma secao obrigatoria? |
| Clareza | Esta claro e sem ambiguidades? |
| Evidencia | Afirmacoes tem suporte? |
| Testabilidade | Requisitos sao verificaveis? |
| Consistencia | Alinha com outros artefatos? |
| Acionabilidade | Da para agir com base nisso? |
Niveis de Severidade
- Critico: Bloqueia aprovacao - deve corrigir
- Importante: Impacta qualidade - recomenda correcao
- Sugestao: Melhoria opcional
- Informativo: Apenas registro
Output
Criar arquivo: docs/reviews/{feature}-review.md
Estrutura do Output
# Revisao: [Nome do Artefato]
**Revisor:** /pf-review
**Data:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Versao Revisada:** vX.Y
**Status:** Aprovado | Aprovado com ressalvas | Requer correcoes
## Sumario
| Criterio | Status | Observacao |
**Score Geral:** [X]/10
## Pontos Positivos
## Issues Identificados
### Critico
### Importante
### Sugestao
## Pendencias
## Recomendacao
[ ] Aprovar como esta
[ ] Aprovar apos correcoes menores
[ ] Retornar para correcoes
**Proximos Passos:**
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 119 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 5ae5896d191d
pf-review is a command published in the GitHub repository matheusbrramos/ProductFlow (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 721 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.