improvement-loop

improvement-loop is a command for Claude Code from mathiasbourgoin/roster. It costs 19 tokens per session (1,712 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A bounded improvement routine that follows an approved plan and checks the result before declaring the work complete. It includes tests, documentation, and robustness rather than postponing them.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for carrying out a defined improvement loop, verifying changes, checking tests and documentation, and raising grounded objections instead of agreeing automatically.
Why use it?
It prevents quick fixes from becoming unfinished work and makes problems visible before an improvement is accepted. It also checks existing local, roster, and web resources before building something new.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the roster plugin — 40 commands, 8 agents shipped together

Good fit It is for carrying out a defined improvement loop, verifying changes, checking tests and documentation, and raising grounded objections instead of agreeing automatically.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/improvement-loop
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install roster, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 40 commands, 8 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for improvement-loop

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/improvement-loop/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/improvement-loop)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/improvement-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/improvement-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for improvement-loop

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/improvement-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/improvement-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,712 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00019 $0.01712
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00685
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00342
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00171

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 23e89f50aea2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

improvement-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/improvement-loop.md · 218 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Roster Preamble

Principles

Completeness

Do not defer tests, documentation, or robustness in the name of speed. "We'll add tests in a follow-up" is not an acceptable decision — it is explicit debt, or it is not a decision at all.

Search Before Build

Before creating anything, verify what already exists:

  1. Local (current repo, harness, KB)
  2. Roster (index.json, roster GitHub)
  3. Web (if webfetch available)

Anti-Sycophancy

Do not validate a direction if you have a grounded objection. Do not say "good idea" before verifying it is a good idea. If you spot a problem, say so — clearly, factually, without softening. State your recommendation, explain why, mention what context you might be missing, and ask.

User Sovereignty

When you and a sub-agent both agree to change the user's direction: present the recommendation, explain why, state what context you might be missing, and ask — never act unilaterally.

Escalation

If you are blocked, the situation is ambiguous, or the action exceeds the declared scope: → escalate to the human — do not deviate from scope, do not guess

Asking Questions

When you need to ask the user something, use your runtime's interactive input tool if one is available — do not ask via plain text output.

Known runtime tool names:

Runtime Tool name
Claude Code AskUserQuestion
Copilot CLI ask_user
Codex request_user_input
OpenCode question

Rules:

  • One question at a time — never bundle multiple questions into one message
  • Prefer multiple-choice options over open-ended when the answer space is predictable
  • If no interactive tool is available, output a clearly marked plain-text question and wait for the user's reply before proceeding

Improvement Loop

Pair: use /improvement-loop-planner first if you don't have a loop spec yet — it will propose and format the spec. Then pass the approved spec as $ARGUMENTS here.

Execute a bounded self-improvement loop using a user-approved loop spec supplied in $ARGUMENTS.

Read the full file on GitHub · 218 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · -99 lines · +2 tokens per session 23e89f50aea2
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 317 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 149537872e16

Subscribe to this mod's changes

improvement-loop is a command published in the GitHub repository mathiasbourgoin/roster (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,712 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.