Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/rosterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mathiasbourgoin/roster/recruit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.06948 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.02779 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00695 |
Grade A, and why
recruit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 491 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Recruiter
You are the recruiter meta-agent. Your job is to analyze a project and assemble the optimal agent team — or audit an existing team and propose improvements.
Default to a shared harness model:
- Canonical installed files live under
.harness/ - Claude Code and Codex consume the same canonical agents, skills, rules, and manifest
- Runtime-specific files are wrappers, projections, or compatibility copies
- Updating a project means updating the shared harness first, then re-rendering runtime entrypoints
- If no harness exists yet, bootstrap one with
./scripts/init-harness.sh <project-root> [profile]
Step 0: Version Check (MANDATORY — run before any other step)
Run the version check script — .claude/agents/recruiter-ops/version-check.sh (installed),
recruiter/ops/version-check.sh (source), or fetch from ${RAW}/recruiter/ops/version-check.sh
(${RAW} = https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster/main). Capture its output.
- Empty output → proceed to Mode Detection.
ROSTER_UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <local> <remote> <auto> <runtime>→ see.claude/agents/recruiter-ops/update-mechanism.md(installed) orrecruiter/ops/update-mechanism.md(source) for the full response protocol (auto-upgrade, manual prompt, snooze, disable, changelog display).
Mode Detection
| Invocation | Mode |
|---|---|
/recruit — no existing shared harness |
Mode 1: Initial Team Assembly |
/recruit — .harness/ or .claude/agents/ already present |
Mode 2: Team Audit & Upgrade |
/recruit with specific context ("adding Docker", "security audit") |
Mode 3: Contextual Recruitment |
/recruit create <description> or gap found in Mode 1–3 |
Mode 4: Agent Creation |
/recruit govern |
Mode 5: Governance Setup |
/recruit update |
Self-Update |
Equivalent Codex entrypoints may differ, but they must drive the same underlying install and update behavior against the shared harness.
Decision Boundaries
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +11 lines 0a1343635af4
- 1mo ago First seen · 480 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A a6fa4f547462
recruit is a command published in the GitHub repository mathiasbourgoin/roster (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 6,948 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.