Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Matt-Dionis/claude-code-configsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/matt-dionis/claude-code-configs/optimize-components)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/matt-dionis/claude-code-configs/optimize-components"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/matt-dionis/claude-code-configs/optimize-components/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/matt-dionis/claude-code-configs/optimize-components"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/matt-dionis/claude-code-configs/optimize-components.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00188 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
optimize-components scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Analyze the current component structure and optimize the Server/Client Component boundaries:
- Find all components currently marked with 'use client'
- Analyze if they truly need client-side interactivity
- Identify components that can be converted to Server Components
- Find Server Components that are passing non-serializable props
- Suggest component composition patterns to minimize client JS
- Identify opportunities for:
- Moving data fetching to Server Components
- Extracting interactive parts into smaller Client Components
- Using children pattern to compose Server and Client Components
Provide a detailed report with:
- Current client/server component ratio
- Components that can be optimized
- Specific refactoring suggestions
- Estimated bundle size reduction
Focus on reducing the amount of JavaScript sent to the client while maintaining functionality.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A e174ece97ecd
optimize-components is a command published in the GitHub repository Matt-Dionis/claude-code-configs (619 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 188 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
plan-feature
Plan a feature from BRD-lite brief or clear intent into PRD (What), decisions, implementation plan, and task slices.
retro-learn
Convert delivery findings into skill, eval, workflow, and documentation improvements.
prototype-loop
Enter leveraged-prototype focus mode — focus marker plus normal watch/rebuild loop for visual-parity work and batch upstream framework gap-fixes.
review-arch
Review the current branch for code quality, TypeScript, and React/Next.js patterns. Supports whole-branch review or scoped review by path, feature, or base branch.
story-and-test
For the component(s) in scope.
a11y-audit-react
Identify accessibility violations in React components and provide actionable remediation aligned with WCAG 2.2 Level AA. This is the guided audit workflow that applies the standards defined in the a11y-automation and react-components rules.