Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maxime-tremblay/APEXLang-Project-TemplateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/maxime-tremblay/apexlang-project-template/validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/maxime-tremblay/apexlang-project-template/validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/maxime-tremblay/apexlang-project-template/validate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/maxime-tremblay/apexlang-project-template/validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/maxime-tremblay/apexlang-project-template/validate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00334 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Validate one or more APEXLang applications before importing.
Usage:
/validate— validates the default app ($APEX_APP_ID) fromapex/app{id}//validate 101— validates app 101 fromapex/app101//validate 100 101 102— validates each app in sequence
Steps:
- Resolve the list of app IDs:
- If
$ARGUMENTSis provided, treat it as a space-separated list of app IDs - Otherwise, use
$APEX_APP_IDas the single app ID
- If
- Open a SQLcl session and connect using the saved connection:
sql /nolog connect -name "$SQLCL_CONNECTION" - For each app ID, run validation:
apex validate -input /path/to/apex/app{id} - Review any errors or warnings returned for each app
- If there are errors, identify which .apx file is affected and what the issue is
- Report a summary per app: how many files were validated, any warnings to be aware of, and whether it is safe to import
Notes:
apexis a SQLcl subcommand — it requires an active SQLcl sessionapex validatecan also run without a live connection for local syntax checks only- Do not proceed with import if validation returns any errors
- If there are warnings only, flag them clearly and ask the developer whether to proceed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A f8c1cb47cc6d
validate is a command published in the GitHub repository maxime-tremblay/APEXLang-Project-Template (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 334 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
validate compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| validatemaxime-tremblay/APEXLang-Project-Template | Command | 2 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 12 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| speckit.bug.testgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |