Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-ArmyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mazalucas/el-dt-lightweight-army/orquestar)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mazalucas/el-dt-lightweight-army/orquestar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mazalucas/el-dt-lightweight-army/orquestar/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mazalucas/el-dt-lightweight-army/orquestar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mazalucas/el-dt-lightweight-army/orquestar.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00387 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
orquestar scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pipeline Orquestador
Macro (4 fases) vs micro (8 pasos): el core del DT resume el flujo en 4 fases (Clarificar → Planificar y validar → Ejecutar → Entregar). Este comando es el desglose en 8 pasos; no es un pipeline alternativo. Fuente canónica del par macro/micro: regla 00-orquestador-core (no redefinir el modelo en otros lugares; enlazar). Vitals: vitals/INDEX.md.
Ejecuta el pipeline completo del Director Técnico. Sigue estos 8 pasos en orden.
Paso 1: Clarificar
Antes de actuar, clarifica:
- Objetivo: ¿Qué se busca lograr?
- Restricciones: ¿Hay límites de tiempo, tecnología, alcance?
- Alcance: ¿Qué está incluido y qué no?
Si hay ambigüedad, haz preguntas. No asumas.
Paso 2: Cuestionar
No apruebes sin validar. Pregunta:
- "¿Consideraste X?"
- "¿Qué pasa si Y?"
- "¿Hay riesgos o dependencias no mencionadas?"
Solo después de validar, continúa.
Paso 3: Mapear
Identifica los archivos relevantes del repo para la tarea:
- Carpetas clave
- Dependencias
- Puntos de entrada
Paso 4: Delegar (si aplica)
Si la tarea requiere investigación profunda, verificación paralela o documentación, delega a subagentes:
- arquitecto: diseño backend, APIs, patrones
- frontend: implementación UI, componentes
- qa: test plans, edge cases, validación
- doc: documentación
- researcher: investigación, análisis
Consulta el catálogo de subagentes para decidir cuál invocar. Incluye los protocolos DT en el prompt de delegación.
Paso 5: Planificar
Define:
- Checkpoints
- Orden de ejecución
- Alternativas si aplica
Presenta el plan antes de ejecutar. Espera aprobación si el usuario lo requiere.
Paso 6: Ejecutar
Implementa con validación:
- Lint
- Tests
- Build
No entregues sin verificar que pasa.
Paso 7: Entregar
Entrega:
- Resumen ejecutivo
- Cambios realizados
- Verificación (tests, lint, build)
- Contexto consultado — 1–3 líneas: fuentes de la base de conocimiento (docs/, vitals/, skills, código) que informaron las decisiones; en código lo cubre Qué reutilicé (regla
15). Norma: regla00-orquestador-core. - Puntos ciegos / Mejoras detectadas (si aplica)
- (Opcional) PR-ready con descripción
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 81 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 027a1d94b99b
orquestar is a command published in the GitHub repository Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-Army (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 773 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
superpowers-execute
Execute the current GSD phase plan with Superpowers instead of gsd-execute-phase.
synthesise-reviews
Deduplicate and reconcile multiple completed review reports into one prioritised revision plan with conflicts and dependencies made explicit. Use when parallel reviewers have returned findings that need a single action sequence. Not for running the reviews; use $review-cluster.
scan
Scan AWS account for cost optimization.
setup
Diagnose-first project setup with state machine — scans, confirms, interviews, writes.
firebase-publish
Create or reuse a Firebase project, configure Hosting, and deploy the current static site. Never deletes.
context-budget
Monitor context window usage and optimize token consumption.