Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/mckruz/claude-code-sdlc/sdlc-nextgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MCKRUZ/claude-code-sdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mckruz/claude-code-sdlc/sdlc-next)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mckruz/claude-code-sdlc/sdlc-next"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mckruz/claude-code-sdlc/sdlc-next.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02841 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01421 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00568 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00284 |
Grade A, and why
sdlc-next scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/sdlc-next — Advance to Next Phase
Run exit gate checks for the current phase and advance to the next phase if all gates pass.
Instructions
-
Locate state file: Look for
.sdlc/state.yamlin the current project directory. If not found, tell the user to run/sdlc-setupfirst. -
Read state: Load
.sdlc/state.yamlto determine the current phase. -
Run gate checks: Execute the gate checker for the current phase:
uv run --project ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check_gates.py --state .sdlc/state.yaml -
Evaluate results:
If ANY MUST gate fails:
- Display the failure report
- List specific blockers with remediation suggestions
- Do NOT advance the phase
- Generate the phase HTML report anyway (shows what's missing):
uv run --project ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/generate_phase_report.py --state .sdlc/state.yaml --phase <phase-number> - Automatically open the report in the user's default browser (
starton Windows,openon macOS,xdg-openon Linux) - Suggest actions: create missing artifacts, fix incomplete content, etc.
- Offer smart repair: "Would you like me to attempt auto-repair on the fixable issues?" If yes, spawn the
gate-repairagent, then re-run gates. Seereferences/smart-repair.mdfor what's repairable.
If all MUST gates pass (SHOULD/MAY may still have warnings):
- Display success message
- Show any SHOULD/MAY warnings
- Generate the final phase HTML report before advancing:
uv run --project ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/generate_phase_report.py \ --state .sdlc/state.yaml --phase <phase-number> - Automatically open the report in the user's default browser (
starton Windows,openon macOS,xdg-openon Linux) - HITL GATE — Ask for explicit sign-off before advancing: Present the phase summary (what was produced, key decisions made) and ask: "Does this look correct? Shall I advance to Phase N?" Do NOT call
advance_phase.pyuntil the human explicitly confirms. - Optional — capture discipline sign-off(s): After the human confirms the advance, use
AskUserQuestionto offer (optionally) recording per-discipline sign-off on this phase's work: "Any discipline sign-offs to record for this phase? (e.g. Design signs the interaction specs, Data signs the data contract, Bizreq signs the business rules.)" This is optional — skipping it advances exactly as before. For each sign-off the human names, capture aDiscipline:Section:Nametriple; capture the overall signer name too if given. These feed theadvance_phase.pyinvocation in step 6 via--signed-by "<name>"and one--discipline-signoff "Discipline:Section:Name"per sign-off (repeatable). No sign-offs → no flags → byte-identical state. The named human signs; the agent only records what it is told.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 172 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3663b2ecb04b
sdlc-next is a command published in the GitHub repository MCKRUZ/claude-code-sdlc (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,841 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.