Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mercurialsolo/claudectlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mercurialsolo/claudectl/role)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mercurialsolo/claudectl/role"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mercurialsolo/claudectl/role/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mercurialsolo/claudectl/role"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mercurialsolo/claudectl/role.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00498 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00199 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
role scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Set this session's agent-bus role so peers can send it directed messages with claudectl bus send <role> …. The binding is PID-keyed — it follows this exact Claude Code process, so re-runs in the same project don't get confused by other sessions sharing the cwd.
Common role names: spec, frontend, backend, data-analyst, tester, infra, reviewer, planner. Pick whatever maps to what this session will actually own.
What to do
-
The user supplied a role name as
{{args}}. If it's empty, runclaudectl bus role suggest --json --top 3to fetch transcript-derived candidates and propose them; if even that comes back empty, ask the user what to name the role and stop until they reply. -
Run:
claudectl bus role bind --self {{args}}The
--selfflag tells the CLI to walk the ancestor process chain, find this Claude Code process, and bind the role to that pid + the current working directory. No need to look up the pid yourself. -
On success the command prints
bound role <name> -> <cwd> (pid=<pid>). Echo that confirmation back to the user. -
If the command errors with "could not find a Claude Code process in the ancestor chain", the plugin was invoked outside the normal
claudeexecution context. Tell the user to try again from inside a Claude session, or pass an explicit pid viaclaudectl bus role bind <name> <cwd> --pid <pid>. -
If the user wants to verify the binding, suggest
claudectl bus role listorclaudectl bus whoami --json.
Why pid-binding
Cwd-only bindings get ambiguous when two Claude sessions run in the same folder (e.g. worktrees, or one session in /repo and another in /repo/sub). The pid binding picks the specific session you ran /role from, so directed messages land where you expect.
See issues #307 (pid binding) and #310 (this slash command).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A fd6c4e3bfc6a
role is a command published in the GitHub repository mercurialsolo/claudectl (202 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 498 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
computer
Drive a computer's screen, mouse, and keyboard.
unifly-audit
Read-only audit of UniFi WiFi security, firewall policy, and network isolation.
unifly-status
Read-only health check of UniFi infrastructure, including devices and alerts.
afsr
Review feature spec - improve the spec itself before implementation (shortcut for feature-spec-review).
aigon-feedback-triage
Run a triage loop for one feedback item with explicit human confirmation before writes.
check
Audit a .nika workflow before it runs — findings with their NIKA-XXXX codes, cost envelope, permits.