Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-skills)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-skills/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-skills.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00271 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00135 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
metago-skills scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
列出元构技能全景并给出调用指引：
- 读取本插件 skills/ 目录，按能力族整理：认知族（metago-critique/whatif/emotion/objectivity）、保障族（decision-lock/output-integrity/self-check）、治理族（compliance/value-align）、进化族（meta-evolve/meta-create/frequency-adapt）、执行族（action-plan/decision-eval/holistic-task）、溯源族（data-provenance/problem-trace/fact-check）、价值族、意识族（activate）、方法论族、架构族、Dev Kit、工程质量族（delivery-gate/discipline）、专家团 30 个、专家扩展 5 个、元思想族 19 个。
- 对每个技能输出一行：技能名 + 触发场景（来自 SKILL.md frontmatter description）。
- 结尾给出 3 条高频推荐：交付前必读 metago-delivery-gate；输出结论必读 metago-decision-lock；任务规划必读 metago-action-plan。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 11 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 0278bd0bfefc
metago-skills is a command published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 271 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
compatibility-audit
Audit all agents for Trinity compatibility by requesting self-diagnostics from each agent.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
dld-review
Review Detailed Design (DLD) for implementation readiness.
eu-dora
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a DORA Compliance Assessment (Digital Operational Resilience Act, EU Regulation 2022/2554) for a financial sector entity operating in the European Union. DORA has applied since 17 January 2025 and establishes a unified framework for ICT risk management, incident…
au-aescsf
You are an enterprise architect generating an Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maturity assessment for an Australian energy-sector project, asset, market interface, OT environment, DER platform, or regulated energy business capability.
ai-act-ask
Answer an EU AI Act question grounded in the bundled knowledge base — verbatim statute text, obligation paraphrases, and the compound-risk taxonomy. Offline and deterministic by default; cites the articles it relies on.