security-code-audit-setup

A command for setting up and checking a security-review system. It verifies whether grepai and Ollama for local embeddings are installed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check the installation of grepai and Ollama, which provides locally generated search representations for the system.
Why use it?
It helps identify missing setup pieces before security review work begins.

Command

Part of the security-code-audit plugin — 7 skills, 3 commands, 1 agent shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/mfakbar127/agent-skills/security-code-audit-setup
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mfakbar127/agent-skills

Or install security-code-audit, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 skills, 3 commands, 1 agent.

Per session 27 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 745 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 2 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00027 $0.00745
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00373
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00149
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00075

Measured 2d ago against content hash d509a37dea05, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

security-code-audit-setup scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Downloads and executes remote codemediumSupply chain

curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.

| Linux/macOS | `curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yoanbernabeu/grepai/main/install.sh \| sh` |

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

allowed-tools: Bash(which *), Bash(uname *), Bash(curl *), Bash(brew *), Bash(ollama *), Bash(grepai *), Bash(pgrep *), Bash(lsof *), Bash(ls *), Read
plugins/security-code-audit/commands/security-code-audit-setup.md · 107 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 107 lines · 27 tokens per session scan B d509a37dea05

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-code-audit-setup is a command published in the GitHub repository mfakbar127/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 745 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.