Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki/main/.claude/commands/lint-wiki.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wikiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint-wiki)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint-wiki"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint-wiki/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint-wiki"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint-wiki.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00653 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
lint-wiki scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Execute the Lint procedure defined in SKILL.md. Scan all pages under wiki/ and produce a health-check report.
Checks (per SKILL.md "Lint" section)
Structural checks (fast)
- Frontmatter completeness:
summary:/venue_short:/source_count:/year:(Dataview depends on them) - Frontmatter naming consistency: mixed use of
updated:vslast_updated: - Orphan pages: no inbound
[[wikilink]](excluding meta pages:log,index,dashboard,pending-review,review-history,integration-progress,SKILL) - Broken links:
[[xxx]]pointing to a non-existent page - Source pages missing the "Relation to the knowledge base" section
Semantic checks (slow)
- Concepts mentioned in prose but not yet promoted to their own page
- Concept pages whose "Current state" or "Key methods" sections may need updating (new sources joined but the section was not updated)
- Contradictions or stale claims
- Suggested next directions for reading or searching
Phase 2 (review cascade)
- Cascade-caveat consistency: for each
disputed,reviewed_with_notes, orunreviewedpaper, confirm that every wiki citation carries the correct marker (see SKILL.md "Cascade caveat rules"):disputedcitations must carry[DISPUTED]unreviewedcitations must carry[UNREVIEWED]reviewed_with_notescitations should carry a caveat when relevant (recommended, not strict)
- Review-status distribution: counts of
reviewed/reviewed_with_notes/disputed/unreviewed; ifunreviewedexceeds 20 %, flag a cleanup reminder
Output
- Report the structured lint findings to the user (categories, counts, explicit lists)
- Auto-fix mechanical issues (e.g. frontmatter naming inconsistency, missing cascade caveats)
- Append a lint entry to
wiki/log.mdrecording:- Scale statistics (pages per section)
- Frontmatter completeness metrics
- Issue categories and counts
- Auto-fixed items
- Items left for later
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 55 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 65dbe981f57e
lint-wiki is a command published in the GitHub repository mickeytony0215-png/obsidian-llm-wiki (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 653 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
daily-okr
Run a daily knowledge compound loop (7 KR). Invoke with /daily-okr or "start my daily review".
session-learn
Extract knowledge from the current session. Invoke with /session-learn or "extract this session".
status
Show memex statistics and status including projects, memos, and pending items.
open
Open the memex vault in Finder or Obsidian.
okf
A command that exports a private knowledge wiki into an OKF-compatible bundle. OKF is a format for packaging knowledge, with a separate guarded mode for preparing material to share externally.
ingest
A command for adding information to a file-based knowledge wiki from web pages, files, or text notes. It classifies the material, updates or creates wiki pages, and adds links between related pages.