Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/microsoft/agent365-python/review-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/Agent365-pythonWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02073 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01037 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 227 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Pull Request
Review code changes in a specific pull request using a comprehensive multi-agent code review process with specialized reviewers for architecture, code quality, and test coverage.
Usage
/review-pr <PR_NUMBER>
Examples:
/review-pr 123- Review pull request #123/review-pr 45- Review pull request #45
Instructions
You are coordinating a comprehensive code review for pull request #$ARGUMENTS.
Step 1: Gather PR Information
First, collect information about the pull request:
-
Get PR details, changed files, and the HEAD commit SHA:
if [ -z "$ARGUMENTS" ]; then echo "Error: Missing PR number. Usage: /review-pr <PR_NUMBER>" >&2 exit 1 fi if ! printf '%s\n' "$ARGUMENTS" | grep -Eq '^[0-9]+$'; then echo "Error: Invalid PR number '$ARGUMENTS'. PR number must be a positive integer. Usage: /review-pr <PR_NUMBER>" >&2 exit 1 fi gh pr view "$ARGUMENTS" --json number,title,body,baseRefName,headRefName,headRefOid,url,files gh pr diff "$ARGUMENTS" -
Extract key information:
- List of changed files
- PR URL for linking in review comments
- HEAD commit SHA (
headRefOid) - required for posting inline comments
-
IMPORTANT: Save the diff output - you will need it to:
- Include relevant diff context snippets in each finding
- Determine the exact target file line numbers for inline comments (absolute line numbers in the target file, computed from the diff hunk headers, as required by
/post-review-comments) - Determine the side (RIGHT for additions
+, LEFT for deletions-)
-
Create the
.codereviews/directory if it doesn't exist.
Step 2: Launch Parallel Code Reviews
Launch THREE sub-agents in parallel using the Task tool. Each agent MUST receive:
- The PR number: $ARGUMENTS
- The list of changed files (so they stay scoped to PR files only)
- The PR URL for generating clickable links
CRITICAL: You MUST launch all three agents in a SINGLE message with THREE parallel Task tool calls:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 227 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 42ebf9babc07
review-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository microsoft/Agent365-python (41 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,073 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.