Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Mininglamp-OSS/octo-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Mininglamp-OSS/octo-server/main/.claude/commands/octospec-plan.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mininglamp-OSS/octo-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mininglamp-oss/octo-server/octospec-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mininglamp-oss/octo-server/octospec-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mininglamp-oss/octo-server/octospec-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mininglamp-oss/octo-server/octospec-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mininglamp-oss/octo-server/octospec-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00282 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00141 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
octospec-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- octospec-plan — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
You are running the octospec Plan phase for this repo.
Task: $ARGUMENTS
- Pick a short kebab-case
<slug>for this task. - Read
.octospec/tasks/_brief.template.mdfor the required shape. - Inspect the relevant existing code to ground the brief in reality (you may draft the brief from the code; the human will confirm it).
- Write
.octospec/tasks/<slug>/brief.mdfilling every section (including the OKF frontmatter from the template — settype: Task,title,description,tags,timestamp):- Goal — what behavior changes and why.
- Load-bearing list — existing behaviors/contracts this touches. Use the
same tags as
.octospec/rules/_index.yamlinject_when.toucheswhere they apply, so the right rules get injected later. - Out of scope — what this deliberately does NOT touch.
- Acceptance — machine-checkable where possible.
- Do NOT write implementation code in this phase. Stop after the brief and show it for confirmation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 25 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 783d0c922b7f
octospec-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository Mininglamp-OSS/octo-server (925 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 282 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
bmad-editorial-review-structure
Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure.
bmad-review-edge-case-hunter
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
bmad-prfaq
Working Backwards PRFAQ challenge that stress-tests a product concept customer-first. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'.
bmad-edit-prd
DEPRECATED — consolidated into bmad-prd update intent - this skill will be removed in v7 in favor of bmad-prd.
station
You are helping the user work with Station - the self-hosted AI agent orchestration platform.
go-conventions
Scan the current Go repo and write .claude/go-conventions.md — a project-specific convention file that rules/go.md loads on every session instead of re-scanning the codebase from scratch. Use when starting work in a new Go repo, when conventions have drifted, or when --refresh is passed to merge in new patterns.