Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00334 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00167 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review - Code Quality Check
Review changes for quality, security, and best practices.
Usage
/review [path]
Path Handling
- No path: All uncommitted changes
- Directory: All files in directory
- File: Single file
Automated Checks
vendor/bin/pint --test
php artisan test
Security Checks
Credentials
password\s*=\s*['"](hardcoded)api_key|secret|token.*=(exposed)
N+1 Detection
- Loops with relationship access without
with() - Missing
$withproperty
Authorization
authorize()before mutations- Gate checks on sensitive routes
Severity
| Level | Examples |
|---|---|
| Critical | SQL injection, missing auth |
| High | N+1 in loop, no validation |
| Medium | Missing types, unclear naming |
| Low | Style, documentation |
Pass/Fail
- Fail: Any Critical or High
- Pass: Medium/Low only
Output
## Review Summary
**Status:** PASS | FAIL
**Issues:** [critical]/[high]/[medium]/[low]
### Critical/High
- [CRITICAL] file:42 - SQL injection
### Medium/Low
- [MEDIUM] file:8 - Missing type
Examples
/review
/review app/Livewire/
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 14890a7d42e8
review is a command published in the GitHub repository mischasigtermans/laravel-altitude (122 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 334 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-audit
Audit codebase for AI-generated code quality issues (vibe coding, Tab bloat, slop).
plugin-review
Tiered plugin quality review: branch (quick gates), pr (quality scoring), release (full ecosystem audit). Detects affected plugins from git diff and reviews related plugins for side effects.
structured-review
Start a structured review workflow with evidence logging and formatted output.
elegant-code-review
Review the current working diff against the elegant-code decision ladder and propose deletions, honoring the negligence floor.
visualize
Generate visual diagrams of codebase structure using Mermaid Chart MCP rendering.
justify
Audit changes for additive bias, Iron Law compliance, and minimal intervention. Justifies every change against a "simplest safe change" standard.