Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00545 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Command: /triage
Systematically triage open issues in the repository.
Usage
/triage
Process
Step 1: Gather Open Issues
List all open issues without labels or with the needs-triage label. Sort by creation date (oldest first).
# If using GitHub CLI
gh issue list --state open --label "needs-triage" --limit 50
# Or list unlabelled issues
gh issue list --state open --limit 50 --json number,title,labels,createdAt
Step 2: For Each Issue, Determine
- Type: bug / feature / docs / question / duplicate
- Priority: critical / high / medium / low
- Component: which part of the project is affected
- Actionability: Can someone act on this now, or is more info needed?
- First issue: Is this suitable for
good first issuelabelling?
Step 3: Check for Duplicates
For each issue, search existing issues (open and closed) for similar reports:
gh issue list --state all --search "[key terms from issue]" --limit 10
If a duplicate is found, link the original and close the duplicate with a polite message.
Step 4: Apply Labels and Respond
For each triaged issue:
- Apply appropriate labels
- Add a comment acknowledging the report
- Assign to a milestone if appropriate
- If more info is needed, ask specific questions (not "can you provide more info?")
Step 5: Generate Triage Summary
# Triage Summary — [YYYY-MM-DD]
## Processed: [X] issues
| # | Title | Type | Priority | Action Taken |
|---|-------|------|----------|--------------|
| 42 | Crash on startup | bug | critical | Labelled, assigned to v2.1.1 |
| 43 | Add dark mode | feature | medium | Labelled, added to backlog |
| 44 | Typo in README | docs | low | Labelled 'good first issue' |
## Duplicates Closed: [X]
## Needs Info: [X]
## New 'Good First Issues': [X]
Rules
- Process issues in chronological order. Older issues first.
- Never close an issue without an explanation.
- If unsure about priority, default to medium and flag for maintainer review.
- Spend a maximum of 2 minutes per issue during triage. Deep investigation happens later.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 72 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f629240ca576
triage is a command published in the GitHub repository mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 545 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
mega-status
Show detailed status of mega-plan execution including feature progress and story completion. Usage: /plan-cascade:mega-status.
hybrid-status
Show execution status of all stories in the PRD. Displays batch progress, individual story states, completion percentage, and recent activity logs.
hybrid-complete
Complete Hybrid Ralph task in worktree, verify all stories complete, commit code changes (excluding planning files), merge to target branch, and cleanup worktree directory. Can be run from any directory.
status
Show execution status of all stories in the PRD. Displays batch progress, individual story states, completion percentage, and recent activity logs.
tracker
Append a new S.N entry to audric-build-tracker.md for the work just shipped.
talent-motivation
Build a per-person motivation map from observed behavior using Self-Determination Theory + dopamine-anticipation analysis. Output is a motivation hypothesis plus 1-2 leverage interventions, never a personality profile. Refuses engagement-survey-as-data; refuses generic "you should be more motivating." Sub-system 5 of…