Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/mlunato47/claude-grc-plugin/inheritancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mlunato47/claude-grc-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mlunato47/claude-grc-plugin/inheritance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mlunato47/claude-grc-plugin/inheritance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mlunato47/claude-grc-plugin/inheritance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01262 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00631 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00252 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
inheritance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- inheritance — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/grc:inheritance
Model control inheritance based on service model and provider stack.
Usage
/grc:inheritance [framework?] [service-model] [baseline?]
The user can optionally describe their provider stack or specific controls to analyze.
Arguments
- framework (optional):
fedramp,nist,fisma. Defaults tofedramp. - service-model:
iaas,paas,saas, or a description like "SaaS on AWS" or "PaaS on Azure GovCloud" - baseline (optional):
low,moderate,high. Defaults tomoderate.
Examples
/grc:inheritance fedramp iaas moderate
/grc:inheritance fedramp saas
/grc:inheritance paas on AWS GovCloud
/grc:inheritance fedramp saas high
/grc:inheritance We run a SaaS application on AWS GovCloud (IaaS) using RDS, ECS, and S3
Behavior
When invoked:
-
Display the Data Sensitivity Notice at the top of every response if the user describes their specific stack (see SKILL.md Data Handling section). If the user only specifies a generic service model (e.g., "iaas"), the notice is not needed.
-
Read the appropriate reference files:
skills/grc-knowledge/audits/control-inheritance.mdfor inheritance patterns by service model- Framework file from
skills/grc-knowledge/frameworks/for baseline control list skills/grc-knowledge/audits/document-section-requirements.mdfor CRM structure guidance
-
Generate an inheritance model based on the service model:
a. Control Family Inheritance Table For each of the 20 NIST control families at the specified baseline:
- Expected responsibility designation (Inherited, Shared, Customer, CSP)
- Brief explanation of what's inherited vs. what the customer must implement
- Key controls to pay attention to in each family
b. Detailed Shared Control Breakdown For controls marked as Shared:
- What the underlying provider typically handles
- What the leveraging CSP or customer must handle
- ODP responsibility (who defines parameter values)
- Evidence responsibility (who produces evidence for audit)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 145 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 603565da8bca
inheritance is a command published in the GitHub repository mlunato47/claude-grc-plugin (181 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,262 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.
compliance-audit
Full regulatory compliance audit for GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, and other frameworks with gap analysis, remediation planning, and evidence collection.
app-store-audit
Run an enterprise pre submission compliance audit on an iOS or Android app against Apple App Store and Google Play rejection rules. Pass a project path or run from the project root.
ios-privacy
Prepare privacy labels, permissions, policy links, and data-use truth for iOS release.