Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moabualruz/agent-workflow-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/moabualruz/agent-workflow-kit/workflow-resume)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/moabualruz/agent-workflow-kit/workflow-resume"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/moabualruz/agent-workflow-kit/workflow-resume/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/moabualruz/agent-workflow-kit/workflow-resume"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/moabualruz/agent-workflow-kit/workflow-resume.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00038 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00008 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
workflow-resume scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Resume an Agent Workflow Kit workflow run.
CLI fallback:
agent-workflow-kit workflow-resume <run-id> --json
Return only run status and artifact path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9981d152d532
workflow-resume is a command published in the GitHub repository moabualruz/agent-workflow-kit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 38 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
workflow-resume compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| workflow-resumemoabualruz/agent-workflow-kit | Command | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewraja21068/AutoResearch | Command | 2 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| evalraja21068/AutoResearch | Command | 2 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 5 | Claude Code |
| instinct-importraja21068/AutoResearch | Command | 2 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 5 | Claude Code |
| rust-testraja21068/AutoResearch | Command | 2 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| skill-createraja21068/AutoResearch | Command | 2 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 6 | Claude Code |
| test-coverageraja21068/AutoResearch | Command | 2 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 5 | Claude Code |