Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohammad19974/bounded-relayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00695 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BoundedRelay Dual Plan Review
Run the requested phase from $ARGUMENTS. This command may update only the
run-local plan-review.json named by the workflow run ID. It never edits the
plan, source, Git state, or an external system.
phase=claude
- Read the pending evidence, its
revision.seal, and every exact path inrevision.artifacts. This isspec.mdandplan.md, plus the configuredproject_profilewhen present. - Review requirement coverage, architecture, security, compatibility, ownership, rollback, and verification yourself. Do not call BoundedRelay or read Codex output during this phase.
- Preserve every engine-owned field. Set
statetoclaude-frozen, add one completedclaudeReview, and leavecodexReviewandreconciliationnull. The following verifier stamps the engine-owned context-boundreviewId; preserve that exact value when submittinghostReviewto BoundedRelay. - Set
modelSourcetohost-selectedandmodelto null unless Claude Code exposes a trustworthy current model identifier. Never choose or claim Opus, Sonnet, or another Claude model here. - Replace the evidence atomically through a same-directory temporary regular file and rename.
phase=codex
Proceed only after the engine has verified claude-frozen evidence.
- Re-read the evidence without changing the Claude review.
- Call
codex_worker_workspace; strict review stops unless the tree is clean and its full revision equalsrevision.head. - Submit exactly one
codex_worker_sdd_reviewwithphase: plan,mode: strict, every exact sealed artifact path (including a configured project profile),expectedRevision, and the already-frozen host evidence. Do not usecodex_worker_analyzeas a strict-gate substitute. Do not include Claude findings infocusor any Codex prompt; BoundedRelay accepts host evidence for the gate but keeps it out of the Codex reviewer prompt. Omitmodelto use server policy unless an allowlisted profile is explicitly required. - Poll
codex_worker_statuswith bounded waits andafterRevision, then retrieve the result once. - Re-resolve the workspace. Reject the result if HEAD or the reviewed artifacts changed.
- Persist the returned strict seal, host evidence digest, structured Codex
evidence, and gate. A result satisfies this phase only when
gate.passedis true andgate.statusisreadyfor the same seal. Add the real job ID and reconcile by evidence, not agreement. - Any High or Critical finding is blocking regardless of a model's stated verdict. Resolve it on a new revision and run both reviews again; never disposition it inside the frozen evidence.
- Atomically replace the evidence. Never expose raw reasoning, prompts, credentials, or event data.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A ffac0bdb12b2
speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review is a command published in the GitHub repository mohammad19974/bounded-relay (1 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 695 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
audit-plugin
Deep quality audit of all skills, agents, and commands for inconsistencies, gaps, duplication, and token waste.
triage
Triages a PR comment — from a bot (Copilot, CI) or a human reviewer. Fetches the comment and diff via gh CLI, classifies it, applies the fix directly to the file if valid, posts a reply on the thread, and resolves it. Run from inside the repo.
ia-review
Perform exhaustive code reviews using multi-agent analysis, ultra-thinking, and worktrees.
announce
Draft X/Twitter announcement post (or thread) for the latest plugin release.
write-skill
Author a new skill from scratch with paired trigger fixtures and full validation. Use when adding a skill that has no upstream skills.sh source (discipline, meta, or internal-pattern skills).
ia-verify
Run pre-PR verification chain -- build, types, lint, tests, security scan, diff review.