speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review

speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review is a command for Claude Code from mohammad19974/bounded-relay. It costs 14 tokens per session (695 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for freezing Claude Code's findings and requesting an independent review of a software plan by Codex.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before implementation to check requirements, design, security, compatibility, ownership, rollback, and verification plans.
Why use it?
It keeps the second review independent, so Codex evaluates the specification and plan without being influenced by Claude's conclusions.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions Claude Code; mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it before implementation to check requirements, design, security, compatibility, ownership, rollback, and verification plans.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohammad19974/bounded-relay

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mohammad19974/bounded-relay/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 695 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.00695
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00347
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00139
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00069

Measured 8d ago against content hash ffac0bdb12b2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

integrations/spec-kit/extension/commands/speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review.md · 65 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

BoundedRelay Dual Plan Review

Run the requested phase from $ARGUMENTS. This command may update only the run-local plan-review.json named by the workflow run ID. It never edits the plan, source, Git state, or an external system.

phase=claude

  1. Read the pending evidence, its revision.seal, and every exact path in revision.artifacts. This is spec.md and plan.md, plus the configured project_profile when present.
  2. Review requirement coverage, architecture, security, compatibility, ownership, rollback, and verification yourself. Do not call BoundedRelay or read Codex output during this phase.
  3. Preserve every engine-owned field. Set state to claude-frozen, add one completed claudeReview, and leave codexReview and reconciliation null. The following verifier stamps the engine-owned context-bound reviewId; preserve that exact value when submitting hostReview to BoundedRelay.
  4. Set modelSource to host-selected and model to null unless Claude Code exposes a trustworthy current model identifier. Never choose or claim Opus, Sonnet, or another Claude model here.
  5. Replace the evidence atomically through a same-directory temporary regular file and rename.

phase=codex

Proceed only after the engine has verified claude-frozen evidence.

  1. Re-read the evidence without changing the Claude review.
  2. Call codex_worker_workspace; strict review stops unless the tree is clean and its full revision equals revision.head.
  3. Submit exactly one codex_worker_sdd_review with phase: plan, mode: strict, every exact sealed artifact path (including a configured project profile), expectedRevision, and the already-frozen host evidence. Do not use codex_worker_analyze as a strict-gate substitute. Do not include Claude findings in focus or any Codex prompt; BoundedRelay accepts host evidence for the gate but keeps it out of the Codex reviewer prompt. Omit model to use server policy unless an allowlisted profile is explicitly required.
  4. Poll codex_worker_status with bounded waits and afterRevision, then retrieve the result once.
  5. Re-resolve the workspace. Reject the result if HEAD or the reviewed artifacts changed.
  6. Persist the returned strict seal, host evidence digest, structured Codex evidence, and gate. A result satisfies this phase only when gate.passed is true and gate.status is ready for the same seal. Add the real job ID and reconcile by evidence, not agreement.
  7. Any High or Critical finding is blocking regardless of a model's stated verdict. Resolve it on a new revision and run both reviews again; never disposition it inside the frozen evidence.
  8. Atomically replace the evidence. Never expose raw reasoning, prompts, credentials, or event data.

Read the full file on GitHub · 65 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A ffac0bdb12b2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit.boundedrelay.plan-review is a command published in the GitHub repository mohammad19974/bounded-relay (1 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 695 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.