Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/moneytosms/claude-start/verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moneytosms/claude-startWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/moneytosms/claude-start/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/moneytosms/claude-start/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/moneytosms/claude-start/verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00116 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/verify
Project-specific verification suite.
This is a placeholder. Fill in per project.
What to add here
Replace this file with the verification steps specific to your project. Examples:
- E2E tests:
npx playwright test - Type check:
tsc --noEmit - API contract validation:
dreddorschemathesis - Database migration dry-run
- Security scan:
npm audit,trivy,snyk - Lighthouse CI
- Domain-specific invariant checks
Template
# /verify
Run the full verification suite for this project.
## Steps
1. <step 1>
2. <step 2>
3. <step 3>
## Pass criteria
- <what "passing" means for this project>
## On failure
- <what to do when verification fails>
Rules
- Verification should be read-only — no writes, no deploys
- Must be runnable headless (no browser pop-ups, no interactive prompts)
- Should complete in under 5 minutes or be broken into stages
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 46 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A adb76acd5a3b
verify is a command published in the GitHub repository moneytosms/claude-start (2 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 232 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
feature-orchestrate
Autonomous multi-phase feature execution.
track
Show progress, flags and open decisions.
plan-status
Show feature plan status for the current workspace.
plan
Plan a feature and write its artifact tree.
review
Check implementation against the feature ledger.
feature-resume
Resume implementation on an existing feature, interactively.