Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/monoes/monomindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/monoes/monomind/receive-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/monoes/monomind/receive-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/monoes/monomind/receive-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/monoes/monomind/receive-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/monoes/monomind/receive-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00159 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
receive-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
First — extract repeat flags: Follow REPEAT PREAMBLE from mastermind-repeat/SKILL.md.
Parse $ARGUMENTS for --auto, --confirm, --project <name>, and remaining text.
Load brain context (follow mastermind-protocol/SKILL.md Brain Load Procedure).
Default mode: confirm.
Invoke Skill("mastermind-receive-review") passing: brain_context, params, mode.
After skill returns: follow mastermind-protocol/SKILL.md Brain Write Procedure.
Invoke Skill("mastermind-repeat") now. Required — do not skip.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 20 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 44fe891047f4
receive-review is a command published in the GitHub repository monoes/monomind (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 159 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-diff
Review the current working diff for correctness, security, and reuse.
review-preflight
Fast deterministic review preparation without reviewer execution.
prepr
Prepara los cambios como Pull Request listo para review.
query
Ask questions about a repository/codebase and get detailed answers with file citations.
simplify
Code simplification review — find duplication, dead code, over-abstraction, and missed reuse.
kotlin-review
Comprehensive Kotlin code review for idiomatic patterns, null safety, coroutine safety, and security. Invokes the kotlin-reviewer agent.