Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mort-lab/excel-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mort-lab/excel-mcp/main/.claude/commands/prp-core/prp-core-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mort-lab/excel-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/prp-core-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/prp-core-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/prp-core-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/prp-core-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/prp-core-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00617 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
prp-core-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to review-general — 186 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review
Please perform a comprehensive code review of the current changes or specified files.
Review Scope
Scope for review $1 Link to must read PRP file if prp was used for implemnetaiton (skip if this is empty) $2
Review Process
- Understand Changes
- If reviewing staged changes:
git diff --staged - If reviewing specific files: Read the specified files
- If reviewing a PR:
gh pr view --json files,additions,deletions - If reviewing a local directory:
git diff - If reviewing the entire codebase:
git diff origin/main
- If reviewing staged changes:
Review Focus Areas
-
Code Quality
- Type hints on all functions and classes
- Pydantic v2 models for data validation
- No print() statements (use logging)
- Proper error handling
- Following PEP 8
- Docstrings following google style python docstrings
-
Pydantic v2 Patterns
- Using ConfigDict not class Config
- field_validator not @validator
- model_dump() not dict()
- Proper use of Annotated types
-
Security
- Input validation on all endpoints
- No SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Passwords properly hashed
- No hardcoded secrets
-
Structure
- Unit tests are co-located with the code they test in tests/ folders
- Each feature is self-contained with its own models, service, and tools
- Shared components are only things used by multiple features
- Future improvements (like multiple AI providers) would go in src/shared/ai_providers/ when implemented
- Integration tests remain at the root level in tests/integration/
-
Linting
- ruff check --fix
- mypy
-
Testing
- New code has tests
- Edge cases covered
- Mocking external dependencies
-
Performance
- No N+1 queries
- Efficient algorithms
- Proper async usage
-
Documentation
- Clear README with setup instructions
- CLAUDE.md is up to date with any new important utils, dependencies etc for future cluade code instances
Review Output
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 872a3e5f8b5b
prp-core-review is a command published in the GitHub repository mort-lab/excel-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 617 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to review-general, differing in 186 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
is-not-duplicated
please investigate the codebase based on your changes - do we have code duplication? After analysis, write updates to DUPLICATIONREPORT.md with the results. Keep in mind that other agents could keep their records, so you need to check the document first, decided to update or add new information.
review
Make a review quiz page from what is due and what you just learned.
review
Comprehensive code review for blz changes.
review
Review the current plan with peer LLMs via inspectrum.
implement
Multi-agent advisory squad workflow for implementing code changes: classify → score risk → select agents → planner → Gate 1 (plan approval) → advisory squad → Gate 2 (Blocker halt) → implementer → consolidator → verdict. Auto-detects depth (quick/normal/deep) from risk + file count; pass --quick or --deep to override.…
inventory
Codebase inventory skill — scans the repo for a named pattern (inline SQL, fetch calls, feature flags, debug leftovers, deprecated APIs, etc.) and emits a structured Markdown inventory cross-referenced with framework metadata (routes, handlers). Language-agnostic and pack-driven — the engine matches whatever a YAML…