Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mort-lab/excel-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mort-lab/excel-mcp/main/.claude/commands/code-quality/refactor-simple.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mort-lab/excel-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/refactor-simple)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/refactor-simple"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/refactor-simple/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/refactor-simple"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mort-lab/excel-mcp/refactor-simple.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00187 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-simple scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to refactor-simple — 61 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Quick refactoring check for Python code focusing on:
- Vertical slice boundaries
- Function complexity
- Type safety with Pydantic v2
- Single responsibility
Scan for:
- Functions >20 lines that need decomposition
- long files that need decomposition
- Missing Pydantic models for I/O
- Cross-feature imports violating vertical slices
- Classes with multiple responsibilities
- Missing type hints
Desired architecture:
- Vertical slice boundaries
- Single responsibility
- Type safety with Pydantic v2
For each issue found, provide:
- Location
- Why it's a problem
- Specific fix with code example
- Specific place where the fix should be implemented
- Priority (high/medium/low)
Focus on actionable items that can be fixed in <1 hour each.
save a refactor_plan.md in the PRPs/ai_docs folder, ensure you dont overwrite any existing files
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0863b01be149
refactor-simple is a command published in the GitHub repository mort-lab/excel-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 187 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to refactor-simple, differing in 61 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
notebook-review
Comprehensive review of Jupyter notebooks and Python scripts.
python-review
Comprehensive Python code review for PEP 8 compliance, type hints, security, and Pythonic idioms. Invokes the python-reviewer agent.
review-uv-script
Review uv Python script for PEP 723 compliance and best practices.
package-review
Review the current Python package for best-practice violations — project structure, pyproject.toml, typing, testing, CI/CD, documentation, versioning, API design, packaging, security, and developer experience.
review
Comprehensive code review for blz changes.
python-review
A Python code review command that checks changed Python files for style, type, security, and common coding problems.