Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to motorway-sandbox/product-os. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/motorway-sandbox/product-os/main/.claude/commands/interview-feedback.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/motorway-sandbox/product-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/motorway-sandbox/product-os/interview-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/motorway-sandbox/product-os/interview-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/motorway-sandbox/product-os/interview-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/motorway-sandbox/product-os/interview-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/motorway-sandbox/product-os/interview-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02239 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00896 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00448 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00224 |
Grade A, and why
interview-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Interview Feedback Scorecard
Generate a rigorous, objective interview feedback scorecard for a PM candidate based on the Granola meeting transcript, assessed against our PM hiring competencies and the role's job description.
Instructions
Phase 1: Gather Context
-
Parse the arguments
- The user provides arguments in the format:
$ARGUMENTS - Expected format:
[Candidate Name], [Target Level], [Interview Type] - Example:
Jane Smith, Senior PM, product case study - If any of the three required fields are missing or unclear, ask ONLY for the missing information. Do not re-ask for fields already provided.
- Check the auto-memory (MEMORY.md) for the interviewer's name — use this in the scorecard header
- The user provides arguments in the format:
-
Find the interview in Granola
- Use
mcp__claude_ai_Granola__list_meetings(with a custom date range if the interview date is known, orlast_30_days) to find candidate meetings, then filter by the candidate's name in the title or participants - If multiple meetings are found, ask the user to confirm which one
- Use
mcp__claude_ai_Granola__get_meeting_transcriptto retrieve the full transcript
- Use
-
Fetch the job description from Notion
- The job library is at: {your-notion-scorecard-url}
- Use
mcp__claude_ai_Notion__notion-fetchto retrieve the job library page - Find the job description matching the target role and level, then fetch that specific JD page
- If the JD is not found in the library, ask the user to provide a Notion link or paste it in. Note this limitation in the output.
-
Read the PM hiring competencies
- Read the file at
team/hiring/best-practice-pm-hiring.md - This contains the full competency framework with excellent/poor indicators for all skills and attitudes
- Read the file at
Phase 2: Analyse the Transcript
- Map competencies to interview type
- Not all competencies are equally assessable in every interview type. Based on the interview type, identify which competencies are:
- Primary (should be thoroughly assessed in this interview type)
- Secondary (some signal may be present)
- Not assessable (no meaningful signal expected)
- Use this mapping as a guide:
- Screening call: Communication (primary), Delivering Impact (primary), Curiosity (primary), Growth Mindset (secondary), Hunger for Impact (secondary), Product Process (secondary)
- Product case study: Product Process - all sub-competencies (primary), Delivering Impact (primary), Communication (primary), Experiment Design (primary), Measurement (primary)
- Stakeholder interview: Collaboration (primary), Communication (primary), Project Management (primary), Ownership (primary), Growth Mindset (secondary)
- Technical deep-dive: Product Process - Build (primary), Experiment Design (primary), Measurement (primary), Project Management (primary), Solutionisation (primary)
- Culture/values interview: All Attitude competencies (primary), Communication (secondary), Collaboration (secondary)
- If the interview type does not match the above, use judgement to assign primary/secondary/not assessable
- Not all competencies are equally assessable in every interview type. Based on the interview type, identify which competencies are:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 188 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A aa42fd787af5
interview-feedback is a command published in the GitHub repository motorway-sandbox/product-os (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,239 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
interview-feedback compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| interview-feedbackmotorway-sandbox/product-os | Command | 11 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |