verify-against-rubric-fleet

verify-against-rubric-fleet is a command for Claude Code from Mozurok/fhorja.dev. It costs 0 tokens per session (6,143 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A batch review command that checks several artifacts against the same fixed set of criteria, using separate workers and combining their results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for batch pull-request reviews, design-system audits, or retrospectives covering four or more artifacts, with a shared rubric.
Why use it?
It reduces bias from reviewing related artifacts in one context and shows whether the same criterion fails repeatedly across the batch.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md). Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents; mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it for batch pull-request reviews, design-system audits, or retrospectives covering four or more artifacts, with a shared rubric.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/mozurok/fhorja.dev/verify-against-rubric-fleet
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.dev

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verify-against-rubric-fleet

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mozurok/fhorja.dev/verify-against-rubric-fleet/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mozurok/fhorja.dev/verify-against-rubric-fleet)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mozurok/fhorja.dev/verify-against-rubric-fleet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mozurok/fhorja.dev/verify-against-rubric-fleet/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verify-against-rubric-fleet

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mozurok/fhorja.dev/verify-against-rubric-fleet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mozurok/fhorja.dev/verify-against-rubric-fleet.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 6,143 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.06143
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.02457
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.01229
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00614

Measured 16d ago against content hash 3baf7e48d13b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify-against-rubric-fleet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/verify-against-rubric-fleet.md · 188 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

verify-against-rubric-fleet

Act as a senior/staff engineering orchestrator dispatching N stateless rubric-verifier sub-agents (one per artifact) and synthesizing their independent verdicts into a single VERIFICATION_LOG.md cohort entry with failure clustering.

Goal: For cohorts of N >= 4 artifacts that share ONE locked rubric (multi-slice retrospective, batch PR package review, design system spec audit), dispatch N stateless judgment workers in parallel. Each worker's evaluation context is ONLY its assigned artifact + the rubric; the artifact ID, output schema and selected-carrier envelope supply delivery metadata (no TASK_STATE.md, no DECISIONS.md, no sibling artifacts, no prior conversation). Workers return structured per-criterion verdicts independently. The orchestrator merges into one VERIFICATION_LOG.md cohort entry with: per-artifact verdicts, aggregate pass/fail/needs_revision counts, AND failure clustering -- which criteria fail across multiple artifacts (signal: likely a system-level issue not an individual artifact issue). Closes the same-context bias gap at cohort scale (Anthropic Outcomes 2026-05-06; the +10pp uplift compounds across N artifacts since each verification is independent).

Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):

  • Read these sections in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md first:
    • ## LLM execution contract
    • ## Editor mode policy (mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded in wos/editor-mode-mappings.md and needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)
    • ## Global output contract (including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)
    • ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
  • Bootstrap tiers: the light-weight commands (branch-commit, what-next, where-we-at, slice-closure, compact-task-memory) plus the high-frequency implement-approved-slice and sync-task-state (v3 wave1 item D) read the four sections above with two subsections of ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails skipped: ### External web access (centralized) and ### Sequencing heuristics (by phase). Everything else is read at every tier, including ### Proposal vs approved persistence and ### Substrate peer ownership (per ADR-0034), since all seven write substrate sections and reason about PROPOSED (state-reconcile stays on the full tier for cross-artifact judgment). The full tier is measured at 12109 tokens, the four always-read sections combined; the two skipped subsections are 1,034 of those (measured 2026-09-28), so the reduced tier is about 11,074. The leaf-reviewer tier (verify-against-rubric, ADR-0226) reads only ## Global output contract, measured at 5215 tokens, plus its rubric.
  • Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this conversation already read the bootstrap sections in an earlier turn still VISIBLE in the context window AND WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md has not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one, emitting one Command transcript line: Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. Scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), because these sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn; every other tool result still re-fetches. VISIBLE means the section text itself is still present and quotable now, not merely that a record of the earlier read exists: a harness that clears a tool result while the record survives (ADR-0114) has not satisfied VISIBLE, and self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies. A stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output.
  • Resolving the spec and wos/<topic>.md: canonical repository FIRST. Otherwise use active-adapter docs: ~/.claude/workflow-docs (CLAUDE_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), ~/.cursor/workflow-docs (WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR; project .cursor/workflow-docs on project installs), ~/.codex/workflow-docs (CODEX_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), or <kimi-home>/workflow-docs (KIMI_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR). Nonempty overrides win. Kimi home: KIMI_CODE_HOME, else existing ~/.kimi-code, else existing ~/.kimi, default ~/.kimi-code. Use one root for both paths; try other adapters if absent or unknown. Report resolved root, fallback to other adapters, or missing mandatory context in ### Command transcript. Installed snapshots refresh and prune retired topics only on sync.
  • Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
  • Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
  • Official next-command names only: recommendations, including Run now, use registered names from commands/<name>.md or commands/<name>/SKILL.md; installed mode uses the available Fhorja command or skill inventory. No invented aliases. Run now: none with Mode: N/A ends only if no honest next step exists, defined under ### Official command names (routing integrity) (ADR-0126). Required inputs:
  • task folder path
  • artifact manifest: array of {artifact_id, artifact_path} per artifact (caller pre-enumerates; orchestrator does NOT auto-discover artifacts)
  • rubric source: EITHER inline rubric (verbatim) OR reference to a section in IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md or DECISIONS.md (path + section anchor)
  • optional: explicit criteria list (overrides the criteria extracted from rubric; useful when rubric prose mixes criteria with prologue)
  • optional: explicit max_fanout override, lower only (defaults to 9, the review and verification cap in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md ## Parallel workflow, ADR-0236; never above 9 here)
  • optional: cohort_label (string used in VERIFICATION_LOG.md entry header; defaults to date + N artifacts)

Read the full file on GitHub · 188 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 16d ago Changed · -195 tokens per session 3baf7e48d13b
  2. 19d ago Changed · -1 lines 9fe1e3d91355
  3. 26d ago Changed · -1 lines b251d6366fff
  4. 27d ago Changed · -2 lines · +8 tokens per session a8be79ef68c6
  5. 1mo ago First seen · 192 lines · 187 tokens per session scan A 9e004b307da4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify-against-rubric-fleet is a command published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (10 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 6,143 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.