Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mrgoonie/human-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mrgoonie/human-mcp/main/.claude/commands/content/enhance.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrgoonie/human-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrgoonie/human-mcp/enhance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrgoonie/human-mcp/enhance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrgoonie/human-mcp/enhance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00171 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
enhance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Enhance the copy based on reported issues: $ARGUMENTS
Workflow
- If the user provides a screenshots or videos, use
eyes_analyzetool from Human MCP to describe as detailed as possible the issue, make sure copywriter can fully understand the issue easily based on the description. - You can use
screenshottools from "human" mcp server to capture screenshots and analyze the current issues witheyes_analyzetool. - Use multiple
scouteragents to scout the current codebase or given codebase (if any) to understand the context, then report back tocopywriteragent. - Use
copywriteragent to write the enhanced copy into the code files, then report back to main agent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 13 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 8b1fbe66c750
enhance is a command published in the GitHub repository mrgoonie/human-mcp (294 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 171 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
a11y-scan
Scan web application components for accessibility violations against WCAG guidelines.
aria-fix
Fix ARIA attributes and accessibility issues in web components.
style
Apply styling to a component using the project's design system and styling approach.
scaffold-desktop
Scaffold a desktop application using Electron or Tauri with proper project structure.
create-component
Create a frontend component with proper structure, types, and accessibility.
analyze-bundle
Analyze JavaScript bundle size and identify optimization opportunities.