Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MrJoeSack/pm-prompts. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MrJoeSack/pm-prompts/main/.claude/commands/prd-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MrJoeSack/pm-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/prd-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/prd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/prd-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/prd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/prd-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00267 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
prd-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PRD Review Engine
Apply multiple frameworks to evaluate and improve Product Requirements Documents:
Framework Application
-
McCloskey Writing Test
- Cut needless words and throat-clearing
- Use active voice and concrete language
- Lead with conclusions
-
Feature Planning Discipline
- Clear problem/solution statements
- Explicit trade-offs
- Measurable success criteria
-
Strategy Alignment Check
- Does this advance the broader strategy?
- Are priorities coherent?
- What are we not building?
-
Communication Clarity
- Can engineering understand exactly what to build?
- Are stakeholder concerns addressed?
- Is the timeline realistic?
Input Instructions
Paste any PM document content, or describe what you're working on.
Works best with:
- Complete document text
- Draft emails or communications
- Strategy or planning documents
- Feature specifications
Output
Provide specific improvement recommendations organized by framework, plus a rewritten key section demonstrating the principles.
Arguments: {{args}}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A aa741e3ac1e8
prd-review is a command published in the GitHub repository MrJoeSack/pm-prompts (6 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 267 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
prd-review compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prd-reviewMrJoeSack/pm-prompts | Command | 6 | 9mo ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |