Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MrJoeSack/pm-prompts. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MrJoeSack/pm-prompts/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MrJoeSack/pm-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrjoesack/pm-prompts/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00251 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00100 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Document Review (Quick)
This is a quick alias for /prd-review - optimized for rapid document improvement.
Apply multiple PM frameworks to review and improve any document:
Framework Application
-
McCloskey Writing Test
- Cut needless words and throat-clearing
- Use active voice and concrete language
- Lead with conclusions
-
Clarity Check
- Can stakeholders understand exactly what's needed?
- Are next steps actionable?
- Is the ask crystal clear?
-
Strategic Alignment
- Does this advance broader objectives?
- Are trade-offs addressed?
- Is timing realistic?
Input Instructions
Paste any PM document content:
- Email drafts before sending
- PRDs or feature specs
- Strategy documents
- Meeting agendas
- Stakeholder updates
Common Document Types
- Emails: Apply stakeholder communication clarity
- PRDs: Apply feature planning discipline
- Strategy docs: Apply good strategy framework
- Updates: Apply economical writing principles
Output
Provide specific improvement recommendations organized by framework, plus a rewritten key section demonstrating the principles.
Arguments: {{args}}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A e994ad466918
review is a command published in the GitHub repository MrJoeSack/pm-prompts (6 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 251 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
review compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewMrJoeSack/pm-prompts | Command | 6 | 9mo ago | MIT | A | 7 | Claude Code |
| diff-reviewcoco-research/coco | Command | 785 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| review-branchdamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 115 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| refactorRchGrav/claudebox | Command | 1.2k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |
| merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |
| initazrtydxb/procoder | Command | 211 | 11d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 16 | Claude Code |