Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplace/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplace/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplace/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplace/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplace/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00278 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit Command
Conduct a thorough security audit of API implementation to identify vulnerabilities and recommend mitigations.
Scope
This command performs security analysis covering:
- Authentication mechanisms (OAuth, JWT, API keys)
- Authorization and access control logic
- Input validation and sanitization
- Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, NoSQL, command)
- Sensitive data exposure and leakage
- Rate limiting and DoS protection
- Security headers and CORS configuration
- Dependency vulnerabilities
Execution Flow
- Review API specification and implementation
- Analyze authentication and session management
- Check authorization logic and access controls
- Test input validation and sanitization
- Scan for injection vulnerabilities
- Review error handling and information disclosure
- Check rate limiting and quota enforcement
- Verify encryption for sensitive data
- Document findings with severity levels
- Recommend specific mitigations with examples
Constraints
- Use api-guardian security skills for analysis
- Follow OWASP Top 10 methodology
- Provide severity ratings (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
- Include proof of concept for findings
- Recommend practical mitigations
- Consider both design and implementation issues
- Document assumptions and scope limitations
- Prioritize findings by risk and impact
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A a5dfcc40cda5
audit is a command published in the GitHub repository mrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplace (35 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 278 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
audit compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| auditmrlm-xyz/demo-claude-marketplace | Command | 35 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 149k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |