Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MuratKus/qaradarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/muratkus/qaradar/qa-pr-risk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/muratkus/qaradar/qa-pr-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/muratkus/qaradar/qa-pr-risk.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00133 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00067 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
qa-pr-risk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Call qaradar_pr_risk on $ARGUMENTS (default: current repo, auto-detected base branch).
Summarise the headline (e.g. "3 of 8 changed source files are HIGH+ risk"), then list the HIGH and CRITICAL changed files with the top reason each scored high. Call out any changed files that have no tests — these are the most urgent. Keep it to one focused paragraph per risk bucket.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 10 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 780d126ac410
qa-pr-risk is a command published in the GitHub repository MuratKus/qaradar (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 133 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
test
Run the repository's actual test suite: every ecosystem's canonical runner — NOT run is never green.
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from ruvnet/ruflo, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
audio-pass
Functional audio review for implementation, mix coverage, clarity, and player feedback.
quality-check-command
This command performs comprehensive code quality checks. Use it before commits or when implementation is complete.
auditar-refactor
Invoca refactor-safety-auditor — gate canônico antes de qualquer refactor. Coleta evidências (linhas, contrato externo, coverage, mutation) e retorna veredito GO/BLOCK/WARN/GO-OVERRIDE.
bug-check
Run automated tests and build checks first, then agent code review. For each bug found, propose or document a regression test.