Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add murphytrueman/design-system-ops/plugin install design-system-opsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/governance-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/governance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/governance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/governance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/governance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00005 | $0.00260 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
governance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the governance review — a quarterly assessment that produces an internal review, adoption analysis, drift summary, and stakeholder-ready brief.
Load the agent instructions from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/governance-review-agent.md and follow the complete workflow.
Before starting, read the reference material for the adoption-report and drift-detection skills from the references: field of each skill's frontmatter, located in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge-notes/.
Begin with Step 1b (Adoption measurement calibration) to establish maturity-appropriate adoption expectations.
The review produces:
- Internal assessment — adoption summary, drift summary, cross-skill interpretation, primary blocker, what is working, recommendations
- At-risk team detail — teams showing declining engagement
- Stakeholder brief — business-language summary for leadership
- Suggested follow-up — which other skills to run next
For recurring reviews, compare against the previous period and flag persistent blockers.
If the user provides context about their review period or teams: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 23 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A cf1fdf3c968d
governance-review is a command published in the GitHub repository murphytrueman/design-system-ops (178 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 260 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
brand
Generate a full editorial brand-guidelines book for any URL. 14 chapters covering brand essence/archetype, colour, typography, spacing, shape, iconography, motion, components, voice, accessibility, tokens, and how-to-use guidance. Print-ready, dark-mode toggle, hand-off-ready single HTML.
pair
Fuse two extracted designs into a single hybrid identity. Pick which axis (colour, typography, spacing, shape, motion, voice, components) comes from which site. Defaults to "visual A × voice B" — same colours/spacing as the first URL, type/voice/components from the second.
dna
Place a design in the measured design space — nearest systems, per-axis percentiles, outliers.
extract
Extract the complete design language from a URL — DTCG tokens, Tailwind, Figma vars, motion, voice, components.
fidelity
Measure how faithfully a clone reproduces a site — pixel-diff plus motion-fidelity into one 0-100 score, a letter grade, a ranked correction plan, and a shareable card.
site
Crawl a whole site and synthesize ONE canonical design system across all pages — unified tokens, coverage map, consistency grade.