Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muyen/vibe-to-prodWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/muyen/vibe-to-prod/refactor-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/muyen/vibe-to-prod/refactor-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/muyen/vibe-to-prod/refactor-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/muyen/vibe-to-prod/refactor-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/muyen/vibe-to-prod/refactor-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00331 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Refactor Code
Refactor: $ARGUMENTS
Pre-Refactoring Checklist
- Tests exist for code being refactored
- Current tests pass
- Understand ALL usages of code
Process
-
Verify Test Coverage
# Backend cd backend && go test ./... -v # iOS - Build and run tests cd mobile/ios && make test # Android cd mobile/android && ./gradlew test -
Refactoring Techniques
- Extract Method/Function
- Rename Variable/Method
- Move Method/Field
- Eliminate Dead Code
- Simplify Conditionals
-
Incremental Changes
- Small, focused changes
- Run tests after EACH change
- Commit working changes frequently
-
Verify After Refactoring
- All tests still pass
- No new linter warnings
- Performance not degraded
Patterns to Follow
Backend (Go):
- Keep handlers thin (delegate to services)
- Services contain business logic
- Repositories handle data access
Mobile:
- MVVM architecture
- Repository pattern for data
- Dependency injection via constructors
Output
Provide:
- Files modified
- Summary of changes
- Test results before/after
- Any risks or considerations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 67 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 0f14c17ae352
refactor-code is a command published in the GitHub repository muyen/vibe-to-prod (34 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 331 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
implement
Execute all implementation tasks from tasks.md with test-driven development, parallel batching, and atomic commits.
optimize
Run 15 parallel quality gates (core checks, E2E/visual, pre-CI validation, plus contracts/load/integrity for epics) with auto-retry for transient failures.
tasks
Generate TDD task breakdown from plan.md with test-first sequencing and mockup-first mode (--ui-first).
test-pr-docker
Test PR with Docker image build workflow.
pre-pr
Run complete validation workflow before creating PR.
testing
Comprehensive testing setup for FastAPI applications with pytest and async support.